|
"... his only other options were to categorize the death as accidental, natural or suicide. None of those, he felt, adequately accounted for how Nathaniel Jones died - i.e., after being beaten with nightsticks wielded by Cincinnati police officers."
And if the officers had shot him as he was in the act of firing bullets into a crowd of children and had already killed ten kids, it would still be homicide. If one of his own bullets had ricocheted off a wall and killed him, that would be accident. If he had turned his gun on himself, that would be suicide. If he had had a stroke while standing there, that would be natural.
If you pushed someone off a bridge when she lunged at you with a ten-inch knife aimed at your throat, that would be homicide too. If you had simply stepped aside and the person fell over the side of the bridge, that would be accident. If she had jumped off the bridge, that would be suicide. If she had had a heart attack on the bridge, that would be natural.
Homicide is the killing of a human being (by another human being). The killing may be justified or excusable. The killing of a human being without lawful justification or excuse is culpable homicide.
Whether the Cincinnati police had any lawful justification or excuse for killing this individual is an entirely separate issue from whether they killed him, and one that may ultimately have to be decided by the courts. They killed him, it's homicide. That's the determination that coroners make in the US; they do not assess criminal liability, and this one didn't do that and shouldn't be misrepresented by anyone (i.e. including anyone seeking to assign blame for the death to the police) as having done it.
.
|