Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Banning People on Terror Watch List From having guns is pointless.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 12:55 PM
Original message
Banning People on Terror Watch List From having guns is pointless.
It would be ultimately thrown out in court...probably an injunction against it would be ordered before it even got to trial. I wonder if any of the pols that are supporting this type of measure even once consulted a lawyer on the legality of such legislation. Denying someone a constitutional right based on being on a secret list is against due process. I see no legal way for such law to stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glen123098 Donating Member (419 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Wasn't Ted Kennedy on a terror watch list?
Yeah it will get thrown out of court. We do have a second amendment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bossy22 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #1
7. along with a few other
elected reps

as it stands now...there is no official way to get your name off the terror watch list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Strictly speaking, he wasn't
The situation was that there was an Edward Kennedy on the watch list, who was not the same person as the late Senator Kennedy. The problem is that the watch list consists of names, not specific individuals, and the names don't have identifying information appended to them.

Which is why the inclusion of the name "Cat Stevens" on the list resulted in the wife of Sen. Ted Stevens of Alaska getting hassled; her name's Catherine, but she usually goes by "Cat." It's fairly fucking obvious that she's not the same person as the singer-songwriter who now goes by the name Yussuf Islam, but the watch list doesn't make that distinction.

The ACLU estimates that there are now well over a million names on the watch list. Not people, just names (including aliases), with no identifying information to tell the relevant individual apart from anyone else who happens to have that name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:40 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Did they actually put Cat Stevens on the TWL?
Seriously?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 03:24 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Seriously; remember that incident in 2004?
Islam (formerly Stevens) was on a flight to DC to meet Dolly Parton, and the system flagged him while the plane was already airborne. So the plane was diverted to Bangor, ME and Islam was rather unceremoniously booted right back out of the country.

He's on the list because the Israelis deported him in 2003 for allegedly donating money to Hamas. Islam says that he didn't knowingly do so; he donated money to some Palestinian charity, but wasn't aware it was affiliated with Hamas, and given that a) he's been consistent about preaching peaceful conflict resolution, and b) groups like Hamas have entire networks of charity front organizations that keep their connection to the parent organization secret, I'm inclined to take him at his word.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #1
16. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
AtheistCrusader Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #16
20. WTF
ferment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-15-09 12:47 AM
Response to Reply #20
21. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
onehandle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. I agree. In fact they should give them guns.
They should give everyone guns.

Guns are ever so dreamy...

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rd_kent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 01:08 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Your sarcasm is noted and much unappreciated. Why post if you have nothing to add?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PavePusher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Nice bales of straw you have there.
Are you preparing to stuff that suit of clothes?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virginia mountainman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
9. Why do YOU, say everyone should have guns?? NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eqfan592 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 10:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
14. Just keep 'em coming, onehandle.
Posts like this from you only strengthen our case in the eyes of those who are on the fence of this issue. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteveM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Dec-14-09 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
18. My old Stevens 311D is dreamy... saw it sleep-walking...
out the door in a Northeasterly direction, no doubt trying to get to Granger Wildlife Management Area, some 55 miles away. Half way there after some 13,487 step/hops on its stock when the right barrel let loose; some grackle on-a-line got it just South of New Sweden. Well, it was understandable since I failed to use it this season, and it got jealous of the Remington. I cooed sweet promises ("wait'l next season") and all is well, now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
4. This secret list bullshit was illegal when Bush did it, and it's STILL ILLEGAL.
The fact that so many people on "our side" can turn around and shit on due process when it's for something that they approve of is, frankly, disappointing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tejas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. If ever an Executive Order was needed,
we need one to revamp that crapload known as the Patriot Act.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DissedByBush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. I can see Air Force One security
"Excuse me Mr. Obama, but this aircraft is public transportation, and you have a foreign-sounding name including "Hussein", a name used by known terrorists. You're also not white. So you're on the no-fly list."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 05:30 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. If Obama wasn't who he is, he likely would be on that list.
Which is to say that the list is a gross violation of civil rights, even without reference to guns.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #4
13. And the *really* vile thing about it is...
...that people who are actually suspected of being terrorists aren't on the list, because the FBI and intelligence community don't want the information who they are (and are not) onto to be available to every airline desk clerk in the country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
one-eyed fat man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-16-09 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #4
23. yes, but
Now it is Janet Napolitano's list and it ain't goin' nowhere!

Despite all the wailing and gnashing of teeth over abuses of power by one administration, not once in my life can I recall any new administration giving up those 'powers' they railed against once they got THEIR hands on them.........

EVER............no matter which party it was, and I am pushing 70 so I've seen a bunch of them!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
aikoaiko Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-12-09 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
11. K & R

The proposal is just a political trap by anti-gun/rkba types to call anyone who opposes it soft on terrorism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoopla Phil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
15. Best way to kill that bill would be to attach a rider to it making it apply to voting too. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Dec-13-09 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
17. Tend to agree
rights are kind of a big deal, and stripping them away should require a trial, not some government official suspecting your might be a bad guy. That is a prime example of a dangerous slippery slope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC