Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Ex-Wife Uses Gun To Defend Self and Children From Drunk, Violent, Ex-Husband.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 09:37 AM
Original message
Ex-Wife Uses Gun To Defend Self and Children From Drunk, Violent, Ex-Husband.
http://www.ktvz.com/Global/story.asp?S=11460980

Deschutes County authorities say it appears Wednesday's deadly shooting looks to be justified self-defense.

Police say Patrick or "Shane" Hankins, as he's better known, broke into his ex-wife, Karen's, Redmond home.

One of her relatives says she fired a warning shot into the ceiling - then shot him in the arm. When he threatened to hit her in the head, Karen fired the fatal shot.

(Snip)

Family members say she shot him trying to defend herself and her children. That's how it appears to investigators as well, who say there's no evidence pointing to anything but a justified shooting in self-defense of Karen Hankins and her frightened children.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bikingaz Donating Member (110 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
1. what would have happened if there was no gun?
just asking
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
X_Digger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. She'd be battered, maybe dead?
He definitely looked to be in a spiral toward family annihilation. Lost his parents, lost his job, lost his family, and advanced on his wife after she'd shot him in the arm.. yah, don't think this would have ended well had she not been armed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GreenStormCloud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He would have beat the crap out of her.
She may have died from the beating, or been permanently injured. Most men don't need a gun to beat up women, but women need them to defend against some men.

But many here would rather honor her as a dead victim than as a empowered woman who fought back and won.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. She would have continued to be abused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 15th 2024, 11:05 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC