Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

OSU fraternity shooting victim says sentence was too light

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 06:37 PM
Original message
OSU fraternity shooting victim says sentence was too light
A man shot in the leg while looking for cans in an alley behind an Oregon State University fraternity when he was homeless says he feels the student who shot him got too light a sentence.

Dennis Sanderson told The Corvallis Gazette-Times that if the situation were reversed and a college student was shot at a homeless camp, he believes the judge's sentence would have been much more serious.

"If a college kid came snooping around my camp, and I shot him? I'd be doing 25-to-life," he said.

A former member of the Alpha Gamma Rho fraternity, Josh Grimes, served 150 days in jail after he was convicted of assault and unlawful use of a weapon for shooting Sanderson in October 2006. Benton County District Attorney John Haroldson asked for five years in prison for Grimes but a judge reduced it to jail time and community service.

The student claimed he was aiming for a trash bin behind Sanderson because he just wanted to scare the man away. Sanderson was shot in the leg. This week, Sanderson won a $41,000 jury award in a lawsuit against Grimes and the fraternity.

"I'm satisfied with the verdict," Sanderson said, but added that he felt the shooting revealed a "culture of animosity towards the homeless" at the fraternity. "If I'd have died, no one would've even known what happened," he said. "But I lived; and I wouldn't let go of it."

According to Robert Kerr, the Oregon State University coordinator of Greek Life, the campus chapter of Alpha Gamma Rho banned guns shortly after the shooting. Every fraternity and sorority associated with OSU already had banned firearms.

Sanderson said Corvallis police Detective Mark Posler apologized to him on behalf of Corvallis after the shooting. "He said, 'I'll get the guy who did it,'" Sanderson said.

More: http://www.oregonlive.com/news/index.ssf/2009/11/osu_fraternity_shooting_victim.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
barbtries Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 06:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. 150 days in jail
for shooting a person. yep. that's wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joeybee12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
2. Yeah, let's just shoot at people to scare them...
...after all, the Second Amendment gives us LIMITLESS rights, correct?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Who has made that argument?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheWraith Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 09:50 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Funny, you seem to be the only one saying that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:12 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yes, that sentence does strike me as overly lenient
This was clearly criminal misuse of a firearm, and frat boy twats like this Grimes guy give responsible gun owners a bad name. Makes you wonder whether the judge was a former frat boy himself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. This case is probably worth a year or two under the facts
but the things that disturbed me is that if the tables were turned (assuming a clean record)- the sentence wouldn't have been a year or two- the homeless guy is right- he'd be looking at 10-15 years for nearly the same behavior.

Also interesting that the civil suit netted $42,000 (I think they're saying net). Goes to show how stingy Oregon juries are, to be certain, but if the tables were turned, my bet is that the judgment would have been double (though there wouldn't have been any pockets).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed Apr 24th 2024, 02:21 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC