Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Sympathy for deranged gun owners

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:06 AM
Original message
Sympathy for deranged gun owners
No, not gun owners who are sane and responsible. They need no sympathy, as they know that President
Obama has never had any intention of coming to confiscate their firearms. But pity the nut cases who
think that Fox speaks the truth and that whatever they hear on National Hate Radio is gospel--they are
the ones who must be getting more and more frustrated with every passing (and peaceful) day.

Most gun owners with a brain know perfectly well that Obama has no intention of taking their guns away,
and that any hype to that effect was started by the radical right to drum up support for contributions
to the NRA or to Republican candidates in the last election. There are plenty of paranoids out there,
however, who are totally convinced that an army of "libbruls" and "towel-head" Taliban is really going
to show up on their doorstep any minute now to take their guns away from them by force.

They must be growing tired of waiting. Here they have been waiting, barricaded in their fortresses, armed
to the teeth, stocks of beer and canned pork and beans dwindling, wondering when Obama's agents of socialism
are going to come for their precious firearms. And they must be getting impatient for the fight to begin.
Their frustration will only mount as they discover that it's the absolute worst-case scenario. Not that
Obama has organized the forces of liberalism to take their guns by force, but worse yet--he hasn't and
never intended to.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:19 AM
Response to Original message
1. On the other hand, simultaneously waiting for the rapture probably takes their minds off it
a little, wouldn't ya think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Where does that NRA say that Obama is going to confiscate people's guns
I would like you to link to an NRA web page that specifically claims that Obama is coming to confiscate currently legal firearms.


Obama isn't going to come after your guns. He wants to ban new sales of widely popular models. He supported the DC gun ban and the chicago gun bans. He has never backed from supporting another AWB. Various other capricious and imposing rules are supported by Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Heidi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:28 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. It's a deftly-crafted misinformation campaign to stir fear.
Edited on Sun Jun-21-09 05:29 AM by Heidi
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
boomerbust Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:35 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Cold Dead Hands?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
6. First of all, I did not say that
I said that that the hype was to foster contributions to them, not that the NRA itself had said so.

But, if you wish, from an NRA site: "But his real record, based on votes taken, political associations, and long standing positions, shows that Barack Obama is a serious threat to Second Amendment liberties." If that isn't
clear enough, then I can't help you. The link was provided by Heidi in post #3.

Fear of confiscation of guns currently legally owned is what the OP was about, and as you noted, "Obama
isn't going to come after you guns." The OP was about people who believe exactly the opposite, nothing else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
9. Your quote
"But his real record, based on votes taken, political associations, and long standing positions, shows that Barack Obama is a serious threat to Second Amendment liberties."

Is true, surely you aren't denying that Obama has a long history of voting for restrictive gun control, associating with politicians and groups which support restrictive gun control, and has long standing positions which are in favor of restrictive gun control...his record and words have brought this opinion of him by liberal 2nd Amendment interpretation advocates.

Further, support for arbitrary bans of, say, the most popular civilian firearms, results in de facto "come after you guns" beliefs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Taitertots Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 08:38 AM
Response to Reply #6
12. So you can't...
Because they don't.

"But his real record, based on votes taken, political associations, and long standing positions, shows that Barack Obama is a serious threat to Second Amendment liberties."
He was for the DC ban. He is for the Chicago ban. He is for banning the most popular firearms in America. He is for creating a de facto registry.


So when you can produce where the NRA says anything about Obama confiscating people's guns, you can bring them up in an OP about people being afraid that he is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:39 AM
Response to Original message
5. Those you describe
number similar to animal rights activists who burn furriers, and militant vegans...a subset so small they are hardly worth mentioning let alone blogging about.

OTOH pro gun rights conservatives have been given enough ammunition (so to speak) through Obama's actual words and actions to raise concern among the right and even the fence sitters. Most middle of the roaders believed that Obama will not try to impose any new Federal legislation and voted for him. It would be the kiss of death for him to encourage or worse yet sign new Federal firearms restrictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:46 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Not small enough
They cause harm and violent death in numbers disproportionate to their ranks.

I certainly hope that he would consider new restrictions should a situation arise
that warrants it. Pragmatism dictates keeping an eye on all aspects and acting
should the situation warrant it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pipoman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 05:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. So, admittedly, the situation hasn't actually arisen?
I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krispos42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 06:10 AM
Response to Original message
10. Do you deny...
...that it is possible through the legislative process to make gun ownership expensive and burdensome and intrusive without falling afoul of the 2nd amentment?

Do you deny that it is possible to severly restrict the types of firearms available to the civilian market without running afoul of the 2nd amendment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JonQ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 09:56 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. That's how I like my basic freedoms,
expensive, burdensome and intrusive.

Hey, maybe we should making voting more difficult; charge a fee, make people take a very difficult test, etc. Afterall, selecting the wrong government is a serious risk; one that could potentially kill far more people than lax gun-restrictions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Euromutt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 07:48 AM
Response to Original message
11. Wow, stereotype much?
See, I don't watch broadcast TV, my car radio presets are three NPR stations, two classic rock stations, and the local CBS News affiliate, and I supported Richardson. I think anybody who describes Obama as a socialist doesn't have the first clue what socialism is. I'm a gun owner, but I'm not a single-issue voter, and with McCain's stance on abortion and GLBT rights, there was no way I was going to vote for him even if he'd managed to reprise his 2000 performance; then he picked Palin as his running mate, and there was absolutely no way I'd touch that ticket with a bargepole.

Now I for one don't think Obama has any intentions of "taking my guns away," in the sense of confiscating the firearms I already own, but I have absolutely no doubt that, given the opportunity, his administration would like to make it difficult to impossible for me to acquire new examples of certain types of firearm; not in the least place so-called "assault weapons." Why do I have no doubt? Because that's what it said explicitly on BarackObama.com and Change.gov, and because Attorney-General Holder stated outright that reinstating the manufacturing and import ban on so-called "assault weapons" was an objective of the administration. That is something I would not want to see happen.

I'm not too worried about that anymore, because a sufficiently large number of Congressional Democrats have made it clear they aren't interested in turning the 2010 mid-terms into 1994 redux. Actually, most gun owners appear to have come to that conclusion. I don't know what you consider to be "plenty," but I rather think the people you describe as "paranoid" aren't all that numerous, and certainly not representative of NRA members. I also suspect that "gun owners with a brain" (and I'd like to think I'm one) don't quite match the notion you have of what kind of people they are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tim01 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-21-09 11:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Obama said he intends to ban "assault weapons" and Clinton, Holder, Kerry.........
It's a long list of people in the current administration who say they intend to ban many common guns and ammo.

It's their words. Unless they are just liars.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fire_Medic_Dave Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-22-09 12:26 AM
Response to Original message
15. More like sympathy for deranged posters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Guns Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC