Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Communists' lack of foresight leaves embassy an annual rent of US$2.50

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
dArKeR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:33 PM
Original message
Communists' lack of foresight leaves embassy an annual rent of US$2.50
AFP , MOSCOW
Sunday, May 23, 2004,Page 11

Located on a quaint, quiet square in the heart of Moscow, the lavish early 20th century mansion which the US ambassador calls home is an architectural gem for which Washington pays the princely sum of US$2.50 in annual rent.

That pocket money is now at the center of a minor row between Moscow and Washington, which also reflects the misfortunes of the Russian currency since the collapse of the Soviet Union in 1991 as it underwent repeated devaluations.

Built a few years before the 1917 Communist revolution by a rich merchant, Nikolai Vtorov, the mansion, now called Spaso House after the leafy Spasopeskovskaya Square on which it stands, became the US ambassador's residence in 1933, when the US and the Soviet Union finally established diplomatic relations.

Its present rent is governed by a contract signed in 1985 for a period of 20 years, at a time when few could have imagined that the Soviet Union was about to collapse -- or at least so soon.

http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/biz/archives/2004/05/23/2003156658
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
htuttle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. The US signed a contract with the Soviet Union
Why would they think that contract would remain valid after the Soviet government fell?

The article says that the new owner of the building has been attempting to raise the rent since 1996, but the US has been 'rejecting' the new contracts.

How diplomatic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Senior citizen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-22-04 11:45 PM
Response to Original message
2. U.S. should repudiate that Commie contract
and insist on paying fair market value. What happened to our capitalist principles--aren't we supposed to be introducing a free market over there? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 05:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC