Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Japan intercepts missile in milestone test

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 07:53 AM
Original message
Japan intercepts missile in milestone test
Source: Reuters

Japan intercepts missile in milestone test
Tue Dec 18, 2007 6:41am EST

By Jim Wolf

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - A Japanese navy destroyer
shot down a dummy ballistic missile in a test about
100 miles above the Pacific on Monday, a first for a
U.S. ally, Japanese and U.S. forces said.

The $55 million test interception at 7:12 a.m. Tuesday
Japan time (5:12 p.m. EDT) followed years of growing
U.S.-Japanese missile-defense ties, sparked by North
Korea's firing of a Taepo Dong 1 ballistic missile over
Japan on August 31, 1998.

-snip-

The interceptor was fired by the Kongo, the first of
four Japanese destroyers due to be outfitted to counter
missiles that could carry chemical, biological or nuclear
warheads.

-snip-

The test involved a shipboard detection and tracking
tool called Aegis built by Lockheed Martin Corp and the
Standard Missile-3 interceptor produced by Raytheon Co.

-snip-

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/topNews/idUSN1765367420071218
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
BridgeTheGap Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. Key question: did the intercepted missile contain a homing device?
Don't laugh. It's been done before and not revealed until well after the "succesful test."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 09:29 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Homing devise, known trajectory and time of lift off, and close equals "shot down" n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
ManiacJoe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Close?
As in (1) starting from relative nearness, or (2) near miss is good enough?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-18-07 10:02 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. near miss is "good enough" as explosion, if timed correctly, would change orbit - of
course it would still land somewhere - but that is phase two of the project (perhaps a bigger warhead so we just get atomic rain).
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 02:27 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC