Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DHS Mobile Lab To Test Terrorist Sensors on Citizens

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Ian David Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:22 PM
Original message
DHS Mobile Lab To Test Terrorist Sensors on Citizens
Getting inside the Democratic or Republican national convention requires connections and a badge, but in the summer of 2008, it might require also require not setting off remote, cutting edge sensors designed to test whether or not you have terrorist intents. The Department of Homeland Security is currently seeking bids to build a portable lab that can be installed at special events whereitcan test new ways to determine if a person is a threat -- including using observational techniques designed to spot a nervous person, remote thermal cameras, biometric equipment and physiological sensors.

The effort is led by DHS's Advanced Research Project Agency (HSARPA), which is the anti-terrorism agency's version of the military's cutting edge research arm known as DARPA -- which has funded research ranging from the Total Information Awareness data mining project to ARPANET, the precursor to the internet.

While Homeland Security won't talk about the Future Attribute Screening Technology (FAST) Demonstration Laboratory, which it is currently accepting proposals for from bidders, citing procurement rules, the idea is to create a mobile lab that can be moved from a presidential funeral to an Amtrak station. Citizens would be funneled into the reconfigurable lab, and screeners would use a combination of current screening technology and cutting-edge tools, which could be anything from lie detectors to brain-wave scanners,toscreen them. Researchers would be able to watch from an observation point and use a computer lab in the back to crunch the results.

Bidders had to submit white papers by early this month and DHS expects to award a contract by the end of April. An initial prototype will then be due in 6 months, and the final version delivered in a year.



More:
http://blog.wired.com/27bstroke6/2007/03/dhs_mobile_lab_.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
1. this is beyond scary!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. And They Don't Think THE MACHINE Will Make People Nervous?
new ways to determine if a person is a threat -- including using observational techniques designed to spot a nervous person, remote thermal cameras, biometric equipment and physiological sensors.


Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Faux pas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Why don't they just round us all up now? Oh wait, they can't. The
National Guard is busy else where. F-a-doodle-do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Canuckistanian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. A "Terrorist Intent" Detector?
They've lost it.

Call in the guys with the nets.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. They Can Use a Very Simple Sensor for The Repiglican Convention
Just scan for any brain activity at all. If they find any, they know don't you belong in the Repiglican Convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
yankeeinlouisiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:38 PM
Response to Original message
6. I wonder if nervousness and
Edited on Thu Mar-08-07 05:39 PM by yankeeinlouisiana
being excited would register as being the same? And how accurate is this really? What if you're simply standing near someone who is "nervous"? Would it mistakenly identify you?

:shrug:

edit: typo
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
peacebird Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-08-07 05:56 PM
Response to Original message
7. thermal scans - hot & sweaty = nervous, eh? Tell that to menopausal women!
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC