Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Canada court says bin Laden employee can be freed (Reuters)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 03:54 PM
Original message
Canada court says bin Laden employee can be freed (Reuters)
Edited on Thu Feb-15-07 03:55 PM by Eugene
Canada court says bin Laden employee can be freed

By Randall Palmer
Reuters
Thursday, February 15, 2007; 2:58 PM

OTTAWA (Reuters) - A Canadian court decided on Thursday that an Egyptian man
who worked for al Qaeda leader Osama bin Laden should be released even though
the court concluded he had perjured himself and had probably engaged in
terrorism.

Federal Court Justice Richard Mosley ruled that the suspect, Mohamed Zeki Mahjoub,
still posed a danger to Canadian society but that this threat could be neutralized
by the imposition of what he said would amount to house arrest.

Mahjoub has been held without trial since 2000 on a security certificate -- which
allows the indefinite detention of suspects if they are deemed a security threat
-- and has engaged in years of legal battles with the government over attempts
to deport him.

Justice Mosley agreed with Mahjoub, "on a balance of probabilities, that he will
not be removed from Canada within a reasonable time" and should be released
from detention until a final decision is made.

-snip-

Full article: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/02/15/AR2007021500904.html
Refresh | 0 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
Kagemusha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-15-07 04:09 PM
Response to Original message
1. Well if they can prove he perjured himself the proper venue is a trial.
It's not complicated. And they had an actual court make a judgment about what was appropriate or not with a rarely used form of detention apparently used for legitimate reason. I'd say that's a step up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » National Security Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC