Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another Chemical Emerges in Pet Food Case -- NYTimes May 9, 2007

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 08:11 PM
Original message
Another Chemical Emerges in Pet Food Case -- NYTimes May 9, 2007

SHANGHAI, May 8 — A second industrial chemical that American regulators have identified as a pet food contaminant may have been intentionally added to animal feed by producers seeking larger profits, according to interviews Tuesday with chemical industry officials.

Three chemical makers said Chinese animal feed producers often came to purchase cyanuric acid to blend into their feed because it was cheaper and helped increase protein content. In the United States, cyanuric acid is often used as a chemical stabilizer in swimming pools, though it is not thought to be highly toxic on its own.

<snip>

Two of the Chinese chemical makers say that cyanuric acid is used because it is even cheaper than melamine and high in nitrogen, enabling feed producers to artificially increase protein readings which are often measured by nitrogen levels of the feed. The chemical makers say they also produce a chemical which is a combination of melamine and cyanuric acid, and that feed producers have often sought to purchase scrap material from this product.

<snip>


Scientists had difficulty pinpointing the precise cause of the deaths, for neither melamine nor cyanuric acid are thought to be particularly toxic by themselves. But scientists studying the pet food deaths say the combination of the two chemicals, mixed together with perhaps some other related compounds, may have created a toxic punch that formed crystals in the kidneys of pets and led to kidney failure.


The article goes on to say that scientists at the University of Guelph in Canada had on May 1 announced that by mixing melamine and cyanuric acid they were anle to create crystals similar to the crystals "found in afflicted pets."

More detais at:

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/05/09/business/worldbusiness/09food.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
havocmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:15 PM
Response to Original message
1. Mix up a 'cocktail' for the corporate bastards who add this garbage to food
to make a few cents more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Triana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. They ought to force-feed it to them...
...that'd end this sick practice.

:mad:
:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-09-07 09:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. What really bothers me is that this stuff has been fed to pigs, chickens,

and fish for human consumption in the US. The FDA says it shouldn't cause any problem. Statements like that always make me suspicious, and glad to be a vegetarian. When will we hear the equivalent of "Heckuva job, Brownie" about this mess?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemReadingDU Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 06:01 AM
Response to Original message
4. I thought cyanuric acid was a byproduct of melamine
Edited on Thu May-10-07 06:02 AM by DemReadingDU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. It is. They're very similar in structure, and melamine can react with water to make CA.
Edited on Thu May-10-07 03:36 PM by eppur_se_muova
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. self-delete
Edited on Thu May-10-07 03:38 PM by eppur_se_muova
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 03:42 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. If you read the entire article, it

quotes some Chinese as saying they sold cyanuric acid itself to be added to "food powder." As I recall, the article also goes into cyanuric acid also being a byproduct of melamine

What they're labeling as wheat gluten and rice protein is also just wheat flour with added melamine and/or cyanuric acid.

:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shallah Kali Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 07:46 AM
Response to Original message
5. FDA Warns Staff about Cancer Risk w/Melamine, Won't Let Pregnant Staff Near It!
http://www.itchmo.com/read/fda-melamine-surveilance-order-warns-against-major-health-risks_20070509

Despite repeated FDA statements saying that there is no risk to human health from contaminated pigs and chickens, the FDA surveillance order indicates otherwise. It states: Pregnant women should not perform this assignment. (Emphasis ours)

Melamine and additional related contaminants have been found in concentrations of up to 20% in analyzed samples. The MSDS for pure melamine is attached as Attachment B and includes warnings “to avoid breathing dust, avoid contact with eyes, skin and clothing”. Chronic exposure may cause cancer or reproductive damage.

Clearly, the FDA is concerned with the safety of their own staff’s exposure to melamine-tainted foods. Despite this warning, the FDA told the press and us yesterday that animals that ate tainted foods were safe for human consumption.

snip

In fact, the Chinese factory that produced melamine-tainted wheat products was long associated with toxic symptoms. (Reg. required)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eppur_se_muova Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 03:38 PM
Response to Original message
8. Need to stop saying 'contaminant'; it is being used as an ADULTERANT.
Contaminant implies it may have been added inadvertently. It was added in an attempt to COUNTERFEIT protein content.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemBones DemBones Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-10-07 03:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. You're right, though I don't know if the general public would know the

difference/ the definition of "adulterant." I can't think of a better word off the top of my head that the average college freshman would know. I doubt the average college freshman would know what "adulterant" or "adulterate" means, only "adultery." (Sex sells.)

Perhaps we should just say the food has been deliberately contaminated.

To increase profits by making the food seem to contain more protein than it does.

One word would definitely be better. . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC