Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. Navy asserts "state secrets" in sonar case - Reuters

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:24 PM
Original message
U.S. Navy asserts "state secrets" in sonar case - Reuters
Edited on Tue Mar-20-07 03:24 PM by Eugene
U.S. Navy asserts "state secrets" in sonar case

By Kristin Roberts

1 hour, 7 minutes ago

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Navy on Tuesday said it had
asserted the "state secrets" privilege in a lawsuit by environmental
groups, a move to keep the military from being forced to disclose
information about the use of sonar believed to injure whales and
other animals.

Navy Secretary Donald Winter, in a court filing submitted on Monday,
said the information requested by plaintiffs was classified and its
disclosure "could reasonably be expected to cause exceptionally
grave damage to national security."

The state secrets privilege, if upheld, renders information unavailable
for litigation. It can be challenged, although the federal government
often succeeds in asserting the protection.

The Navy action is the latest in a string of Pentagon moves to derail
a lawsuit brought by environmental groups, including the Natural
Resources Defense Council, that say sonar used in routine training
and testing violates environmental laws.

-snip-

Full article: http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070320/pl_nm/usa_navy_whales_dc
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unhappycamper Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. It appears the US Navy is causing exceptionally grave dmage to whales.
I guess whales are just another causality of Empire.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Well
my husband was a sonar tech (STGCS) for 20 years and this argument has been going on for decades.I have to go with what he says and will show him this article when he gets home.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Please ask your husband about this paragraph:
"Plaintiffs had requested information on the latitude, longitude, time and date, duration, and name of the exercise for every non-combat use of military sonar by the U.S. Navy anywhere in the world, according to the court filing."

I would be interested if this is even possible.

Thanks!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fedupinBushcountry Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. When my husband was in
there was no such thing as non-combat,when they were at sea they were always considered in combat for they were always tracking Soviet subs. He was in from '70-'90. He said there was a spy that was caught he thinks in the 80's he can't remember his name, but anyway that spy gave away many military secrets including sonar. After that happened sonar changed, the sonar he used went and new sonar was put in.

He said now, sonar is mainly used for listening and very rarely do they have to ping. They probably want that type of info for tracking of dead whales or dolphins, but as he said he doesn't think that the pinging of sonar happens very much anymore, it's more into listening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zywiec Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Mar-20-07 08:46 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I remember being in the Army during the '80's
I believe the spy was John Walker and a few members of his family that sold out the US. Just as your husband said, right after Walker was caught we turned off one of our Crypto machines and replaced it because it was completely compromised.

Even today, I'm sure the Navy would not want to give details of where the subs are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 04:31 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC