Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Duke Energy CEO Doubtful On Nuclear Plant Prospects -

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 09:51 AM
Original message
Duke Energy CEO Doubtful On Nuclear Plant Prospects -
Duke Energy Chief Executive Jim Rogers said Friday he was growing pessimistic about the company's chances of building a nuclear power plant on schedule -- or at all -- because of concern over costs and other issues. Rogers spoke about his doubts to boost his case for building two coal-fired units for the utility's Cliffside facility 55 miles west of Charlotte. (emphasis added)

"I'm not a true believer. ... We're talking about a renaissance in nuclear. I don't see it," he told members of the N.C. Utilities Commission at a hearing to help determine whether Duke can build the coal-fired units. It was his strongest language yet to commissioners that the proposed nuclear plant might not be built.

Duke had hoped to have the two nuclear reactors at the proposed plant in Cherokee County, S.C., running by 2016 to meet predicted energy demand. But Rogers told the commission in Raleigh that Duke is unlikely to meet that deadline as long as issues of where to store nuclear waste and financial challenges are unresolved. They include the rising costs of building nuclear facilities and getting permission from the state to recover the development costs from ratepayers if the plant is not built.

EDIT

Duke has said the planned S.C. nuclear plant, about 55 miles south of Charlotte, would cost $4 billion to $6 billion and take about a decade to build and develop. Company spokeswoman Paige Sheehan said the costs could rise above $6 billion. In an interview after the hearing, Rogers said nuclear plants are becoming more of a challenge to build. "There are scenarios I can imagine that it's not built at all," he said about the company's planned nuclear facility. But he said Duke was still committed to the project.

EDIT

http://www.charlotte.com/mld/observer/news/local/16504751.htm
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
1. The nuclear renaissance didn't last very long.
"I'm not a true believer. ... We're talking about a renaissance in nuclear. I don't see it,"

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 07:20 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. He must be a trust fund kid...
:evilgrin:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Strelnikov_ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 11:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Ouch! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-21-07 02:08 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. lol... nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jan-20-07 07:18 PM
Response to Original message
2. Duke Power was going to build coal, oil and gas plants whether they built a nuke or not
Edited on Sat Jan-20-07 07:28 PM by jpak
http://www.duke-energy.com/news/releases/2005/May/2005051101.asp

It wasn't a nuclear OR coal/oil/gas plan, it was a nuclear + coal/oil/gas plan.

They are just not going with the nuclear plant now...even with all the Cheney Bucks lavished upon them by ChimpCo and the GOP.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC