Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Campaigners attack Shell's charity arm over Sakhalin talks (Guardian)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Eugene Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-28-06 05:26 AM
Original message
Campaigners attack Shell's charity arm over Sakhalin talks (Guardian)
Campaigners attack Shell's charity arm over Sakhalin talks

· Foundation chief spoke up for firm at Benn meeting
· Green group says body is 'a charade and a con'

Rob Evans and Terry Macalister
Thursday September 28, 2006
The Guardian

An attempt by Shell to portray itself as a model of corporate social responsibility was
undermined last night after Whitehall documents showed its charitable arm discussing
a key commercial project with a British government minister.

The multinational oil company says the charity it funds - the Shell Foundation - is
completely independent and contributes nothing towards its profits. But documents
released to the Guardian under the Freedom of Information Act show the director of the
charity, Kurt Hoffman, and the chairman of Shell UK, James Smith, lobbied the secretary
of state for international development, Hilary Benn, in January at a meeting they had
asked for.

Mr Hoffman discussed the controversial Sakhalin-2 scheme, which is expected to be one
of Shell's main money-spinners. The £11bn gas project is the target of vociferous opposition
from environmental groups and is being investigated by the Russian government.

-snip-

But this did not placate environmental campaigners. Mika Minio, of the Platform group,
which monitors the oil industry, said: "What is a guy from the supposedly independent
foundation doing arguing Shell's case side by side with someone from the commercial side?
These documents show that the Shell Foundation is a con and a charade. It's a PR vehicle
to further Shell's business interests."

-snip-

Full article: http://business.guardian.co.uk/story/0,,1882372,00.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC