Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yucca project auditor ignored: 2002 complaints went nowhere

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
NVMojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-18-06 02:06 PM
Original message
Yucca project auditor ignored: 2002 complaints went nowhere
This is a typical Bushworld problem ...

September 18, 2006

Three years before e-mails revealed that federal geologists discussed falsifying documents at the Yucca Mountain nuclear waste project, a worker alerted the Department of Energy inspector general's office to what she described as similar quality assurance problems stemming from corruption in management.

The bulk of the complaint was sent in early 2002 in five Federal Express mailings from Kristi Hodges, a lead auditor for the project's quality assurance contractor. She lodged her initial complaint to the inspector general's hot line in writing on Oct. 15, 2001.

She wrote hundreds of pages in those six mailings about certification documents that were falsified and suppressed and about supervisors who were wrongfully fired or transferred. But the IG's office never publicly acknowledged the matter until the agency responded last month to a Freedom of Information Act appeal by the Review-Journal.

An official said the inspector general's office decided not to investigate the complaint and instead referred it to the agency that was the subject of the complaint.

After reviewing the 146-page response, Hodges said the handling of her complaint is akin to "sending the fox to investigate the hen house."

more...

http://www.reviewjournal.com/lvrj_home/2006/Sep-18-Mon-2006/news/9686762.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
hunter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Sep-19-06 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
1. The very premise of Yucca Mountain is flawed.
"Let's dig a big hole and bury it" is a very primitive sort of solution.

At this point it's all about politics and the only real question is "Who gets the money?"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC