Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Fish Havens Pit Fishermen Vs. Activists

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 05:44 PM
Original message
Fish Havens Pit Fishermen Vs. Activists
http://www.lasvegassun.com/sunbin/stories/tech/2006/sep/06/090601327.html

CHARLESTON, S.C. (AP) - A plan to create fish refuges off the South Carolina coast sparked a clash between fishermen and conservationists.

More than 30 fishermen and environmentalists attended a public hearing Tuesday to discuss the plan by the National Marine Fisheries Service.

The South Atlantic Fishery Management Council proposal would ban fishing for snapper and grouper, in effect bottom-fishing, along the three reefs offshore. The reefs are as large as 50 square miles, as deep as 600 feet and 50 miles out to sea.

Snapper and grouper are popular seafood and among the most heavily fished species in the Southeast.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
1. The fisheries are classic examples of Garrett Hardin's
Edited on Wed Sep-06-06 07:35 PM by depakid
Tragedy of the Commons.

There's almost no way- short of patrolling the waters with gunships- to keep people from exploiting the resource until it's so depleted that it won't recover for generations- or with respect to some species (think Whales) maybe forever.

This is also an example of why (technology is a two edged sword. Modern fishing boats can deplete a resource with surprising efficiency, whereas in former days, they could only capture the "flow" from the major fisheries- without destroying the stock that was the source of the flow.

Fishermen- like loggers on public lands- tend to assure their own demise- without any help at all from conservationists (who ironically could keep some of them in business).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Odin2005 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-06-06 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
2. Tragedy of the Commons.
And something that can not be controlled democratically because of all the workers with an interest of keeping thier jobs who would vote against politicians who legislated against them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oerdin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-07-06 11:08 AM
Response to Original message
3. These refuges do work well.
I recall a study in the 1990's about fish abundance off the coast of Southern California. Not surprisingly places where fishing wasn't allowed, like San Clemente Island which is a military reservation, had not only more fish but bigger fish of every species while places where fishing was free to occur ended up with declining fish stocks. The interesting thing is that when commercial fishing was banned in the Channal Islands National Park (off the coast of Santa Barbara) not only did fish stocks quickly recover with in the park but fish catches went up in the coastal areas around the park.

The bottom line is that allowing fish to have safe refuges where they can breed and multiply is simply good policy which results in more fish being found outside of the refuge. These fishermen are being short sighted.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 03:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC