|
The free market is great at allocating scarce resources AS LONG AS THOSE RESOURCES CAN BE CREATED.
ALL of the problems with 'capitalism' stem from failing to recognize this.
When the price of widgets rise due to increased demand, additional firms begin supplying them. Consumers and producers enjoy the optimum price, without shortages.
When the price of land (or water, or crude oil...) rise due to increased demand, Gaia still has the monopoly, and the price merely rises. With the rising price, those with land tend to hoard it, holding it on the speculation that the price will go higher.
To make this work in humanity's favor (and eliminate poverty in the process) this price needs to be shared. This is an excellent basis for taxation. Nations should tax the value of this land (etc.) until it's sale value decreases to near nothing -- - the price of land (etc.) is set entirely by the demand, as the supply is most permanently fixed - the tax does not increase the demand, rather it decreases it, lowering the price - thus the sale price, through taxation, can be converted to public revenue
For example, an untaxed parcel of land that sells for $100,000 would likely sell for $1000 if the owner were obligated to pay $5000 a year in taxes on it.
This has the net effect of putting each piece of land (etc.) to highest and best use, as determined by local & global economics. Generally: Urban sites will be developed with homes and businesses; rural sites will use their land more efficiently - intensive agriculture rather than extensive monoculture.
Under a scheme where taxes on sales, wages, and buildings were replaced with one on land (etc.) one could expect: An increase in sales and commerce (and a concommant increase in manufacturing, commercial, and retail jobs) An increase in wages (and a concommant increase in sales and commerce - these two reinforce each other) An increase in buildings (and a concommant increase in construction jobs coupled with an increase in places of business, and housing units - lowering the cost of housing) Intensive rather than extensive urban areas, decreasing transport costs such as pollution. Increased agricultural yields per acre rather than merely increased profits per dollar invested An increase in the price of meat vs. the price of grains, legumes, and vegetables.
|