Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Dirty Coal Plants face deadline for installing scrubbers.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
suziedemocrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 08:05 PM
Original message
Dirty Coal Plants face deadline for installing scrubbers.
Link: http://releases.usnewswire.com/GetRelease.asp?id=69891


WASHINGTON, July 27 /U.S. Newswire/ -- Even as some of America's dirtiest power plants start to clean up their act, scores of large, old, and inefficient electricity-generating facilities that fail to use available technology continue to pollute the nation's air, according to a report from the nonprofit Environmental Integrity Project (EIP.) For example, just 4 percent of the nation's nearly 1,200 fossil-fuel-burning power plants account for 45 percent of their sulfur dioxide emissions. A fully searchable database of the EIP report is available online at http://www.dirtykilowatts.org.

....

A bright spot in the EIP report: After years of delay, sulfur dioxide emissions should start to decline over the next several years, as a significant number of coal-fired power plants install scrubbers to meet deadlines imposed under federal and state clean air rules, or to resolve enforcement actions brought by EPA and states. Almost half (46) of the 100 largest SO2 emitters have either begun construction of a scrubber, or have committed to install one by 2010. Large coal-fired power plants equipped with scrubbers have shown that cleaner power is achievable. For example, Allegheny Energy's Conemaugh plant in Pennsylvania and Harrison plant in West Virginia, and Dominion's Mount Storm plant in West Virginia, all have units equipped with wet limestone scrubbers, and these plants are achieving SO2 emission rates of approximately one pound per megawatt hour (MWh), well below the dirtiest 50 plants' average of 22 pounds per MWh.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
demnan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-01-06 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
1. That is so good
I work next to one, VEPCO, in Old Town Alexandria. The coal trains roll in there on a daily basis. Most of the people in Northern Virginia don't even know why their air is so dirty.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC