of mine from the end of last year.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=115x37366Maybe you can list some of your threads that write about conservation in this much detail:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_topic&forum=115&topic_id=34359I don't object to renewable energy per se, and I am on record as being wild for conservation. However, I do object to
magical thinking about renewable energy and conservation. Most people aren't bright enough or educated enough to make that distinction and misconstrue what I am saying.
The main problem with renewable energy is that some of its advocates think it can do
everything risk free. This is a delusion, and a
dangerous delusion at that.
Everybody who talks about renewable energy talks about 30% by such and such a date and 50% by a later date and so on. What they don't talk about is the
other 70% and the
other 50%.
My position is clear: I have no problem whatsoever with whatever renewable strategies
can produce. But if you want me to buy into a 50 year old fantasy that renewables are going to
eliminate coal, oil, and natural gas, sell your snake oil at the Virginia festival.
If you think, though, that the answer to global climate change is a feel good trip to listen to fifteen minutes of lectures and drift around the display booths, well, I am unimpressed.