Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Stunning Triumph: Obama Sends Keystone XL Back to State for Re-Review

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 07:46 PM
Original message
Stunning Triumph: Obama Sends Keystone XL Back to State for Re-Review

"Big news: We won. You won.

That’s Bill McKibben’s headline at Tar Sands Action (full statement below).

In a stunning reversal of a “done deal,” the Obama administration has sent the Keystone XL tar sands pipeline back to review at the State Department:

… the Department has determined it is necessary to examine in-depth alternative routes that would avoid the Sand Hills in Nebraska in order to move forward with a National Interest Determination for the Presidential Permit.

There will be a “supplemental” environmental impact statement — presumably one that isn’t rigged (see “Bombshell: State Department Outsourced Tar Sands Pipeline Environmental Impact Study to ‘Major’ TransCanada Contractor.” It “could be completed as early as the first quarter of 2013.”"

http://thinkprogress.org/romm/2011/11/10/366693/obama-keystone-xl-back-to-state-mckibben/
Refresh | +10 Recommendations Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 07:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's probably just being postponed until after the 2012 election
Obama's a little puzzled by all of these demands that he embrace Democratic values. He needs some time to see how things shake out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Fine.
Once clear in his second term, he can axe the sucker outright.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
msongs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. or approve it without facing any voter consequences nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #5
9. True that. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:11 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. The interesting thing is that in the states where this is actually happening
it might actually get him votes.

It's the states where it's not happening that he's going to lose votes in.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-11-11 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The truth-o-meter will be whether TransCanada keeps stockpiling pipes
Why would they continue if the project was really in doubt?



Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
customerserviceguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 08:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. Which Democratic values?
The ones that espouse environmental priorities above all, or the ones that support union jobs for American workers?

This delay is just a case of the President trying to have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
wtmusic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Obama's statement:
"I support the State Department’s announcement today regarding the need to seek additional information about the Keystone XL Pipeline proposal. Because this permit decision could affect the health and safety of the American people as well as the environment, and because a number of concerns have been raised through a public process, we should take the time to ensure that all questions are properly addressed and all the potential impacts are properly understood. The final decision should be guided by an open, transparent process that is informed by the best available science and the voices of the American people. At the same time, my administration will build on the unprecedented progress we’ve made towards strengthening our nation’s energy security, from responsibly expanding domestic oil and gas production to nearly doubling the fuel efficiency of our cars and trucks, to continued progress in the development of a clean energy economy."
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 07:52 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good first move
Stalling
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
mike_c Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 08:04 PM
Response to Original message
6. it's not dead 'till it's dead...
...and this is only a delay.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pinto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 08:07 PM
Response to Original message
7. Good move to send it back for review to the State Department.
It's an environmental win...for now. :thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 09:11 PM
Response to Original message
10. Dag!! Y'all are so suspicious
Almost seems like you don't trust the President.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:08 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Not trust the president on the environment?
Whatever could give you such an impression?
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-10-11 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Watch for it to rise from the dead again after the 2012 election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink | Reply | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 06:46 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC