Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Research on US nuclear levels after Fukushima could aid in future nuclear detection

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 05:03 PM
Original message
Research on US nuclear levels after Fukushima could aid in future nuclear detection
http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2011-09/uota-rou090911.php
Public release date: 9-Sep-2011

Contact: Melissa Mixon
melissa.mixon@austin.utexas.edu
512-471-2129
http://www.utexas.edu/">University of Texas at Austin

Research on US nuclear levels after Fukushima could aid in future nuclear detection

The amount of radiation released during the Fukushima nuclear disaster was so great that the level of atmospheric radioactive aerosols in Washington state was 10,000 to 100,000 times greater than normal levels in the week following the March 11 earthquake and tsunami that triggered the disaster.

Despite the increase, the levels were still well below the amount considered harmful to humans and they posed no health risks to residents at the time, according to researchers at The University of Texas at Austin.

The findings, published by a mechanical engineering professor at the Cockrell School of Engineering and researchers at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL), provide important insight into the magnitude of the disaster. They also demonstrate huge advancements in the technology that's used for monitoring nuclear material and detecting covert nuclear operations around the world.



"As the measurements came in sooner and at higher concentrations than we initially expected, we quickly came to the conclusion that there were some major core melts at those facilities," Biegalski said. "I remember being in the lab thinking, 'Wow, if this is all true we have a far more bigger accident than what we're hearing right now."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
SpoonFed Donating Member (801 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 06:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Were these academics just sitting on their hands until Sep 8th? n/t
Edited on Mon Sep-12-11 06:07 PM by SpoonFed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 06:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. No
Edited on Mon Sep-12-11 06:15 PM by OKIsItJustMe
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2011.08.007

Development of a new aerosol monitoring system and its application in Fukushima nuclear accident related aerosol radioactivity measurement at the CTBT radionuclide station in Sidney of Canada

Weihua Zhang, Marc Bean, Mike Benotto, Jeff Cheung, Kurt Ungar, Brian Ahier

Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada, 775 Brookfield Road, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada K1A 1C1

Received 7 July 2011; revised 5 August 2011; Accepted 8 August 2011. Available online 26 August 2011.

Abstract

A high volume aerosol sampler ("Grey Owl") has been designed and developed at the Radiation Protection Bureau, Health Canada. Its design guidance is based on the need for a low operational cost and reliable sampler to provide daily aerosol monitoring samples that can be used as reference samples for radiological studies. It has been developed to provide a constant air flow rate at low pressure drops (∼3 kPa for a day sampling) with variations of less than ±1% of the full scale flow rate. Its energy consumption is only about 1.5 kW for a filter sampling over 22,000 standard cubic meter of air. It has been demonstrated in this Fukushima nuclear accident related aerosol radioactivity monitoring study at Sidney station, B.C. that the sampler is robust and reliable. The results provided by the new monitoring system have been used to support decision-making in Canada during an emergency response.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jberryhill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Sep-12-11 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
3. Yeah, because when we lose a city, it would be great to detect that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC