Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nuclear liability hot potato - India

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 10:16 PM
Original message
Nuclear liability hot potato - India
Edited on Sun Jul-17-11 10:33 PM by kristopher
Liability clause threatens nuclear power programme
Sarita C Singh, ET Bureau Jul 15, 2011, 03.08am IST

NEW DELHI: The country's ambitious nuclear programme may grind to a halt because of uncertainty over how the liability for an accident would be apportioned among equipment suppliers and vendors under the provisions of the nuclear liability law, top companies said.

Equipment makers, including Bharat Heavy Electricals and France's Areva, have made it clear that dealing with Nuclear Power Corp, which operates Indian reactors, would be impossible if the present conditions were not tweaked.*

Nuclear Power Corp, the country's only permitted entity to generate such energy, is worried that after a mishap it will be difficult to fix responsibility of vendors. "It's not a turnkey contract. A nuclear project is a complex mix of 2,000 industries/u]<," company chairman and managing director SK Jain told ET. "[u>The question is who will be sued. The damage can be due to failure of components, poor upkeep or not using original spare parts or deploying technical people," Jain said.

...The civil liability for nuclear damage law, passed by Parliament last year, allows operator of a plant to seek damages from equipment supplier in case of a mishap. The Act has fixed operator's liability limit at 1,500 crore per event**. India aims to generate 20,000-mw from nuclear projects by 2020 from the present 4560-mw...

http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2011-07-15/news/29777896_1_nuclear-liability-law-nuclear-power-corp-equipment-suppliers


* The law caps the operator liability and shifts the liability for an "event" away from the operator either onto the government or by going after component vendors. So in this instance "tweaked" means shifting liability from the vendor onto the backs of the public.

**1500 crore = $336,900,000 today

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jul-17-11 10:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Those Who Understand Risk for a Living (Insurance Companies) Don't Want Anything to do With Nukes
:nuke: :hide:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-19-11 02:30 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. And per the OP that group who understand risk includes those selling it.
Note that Areva etal are not willing to be subject to liability for the product they are selling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC