Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Government sugarcoats dangerous reality of nuclear power plants

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 02:52 PM
Original message
Government sugarcoats dangerous reality of nuclear power plants
Government sugarcoats dangerous reality of nuclear power plants
2011/06/26


The year 1986 was a veritable annus horribilis for science and technology. The U.S. Space Shuttle Challenger exploded shortly after liftoff in January. Then came the Chernobyl meltdown in April.

Back then, the probability of a Space Shuttle failure was believed to be 1-in-100,000. That meant just one failure in 300 years of daily launches.

This "safety myth" was debunked by the Rogers Commission, a presidential commission tasked with investigating the Challenger disaster. Richard Feynman (1918-1988), a Nobel laureate physicist and one of the best-known members of the commission, likened the risk inherent in shuttle launches to Russian roulette--a dangerous gamble in which the player closes his eyes to "inconvenient truth."

In Japan, the probability of a nuclear accident was said to be "1-in-5 billion, comparable to being hit by a meteor." I'd say this was more lie than myth.

An accident...

http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201106250142.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
1. When it comes to nuclear power its safety was always overstated
It was a pig in a poke and many bought into it but many of us didn't. What we're seeing in Japan today is exactly what many of us were afraid of what would or could happen when the right circumstances presented themselves. I'm not so sure that this in Japan is as bad as it can get either. We've got a lot of nuclear power plants and most of them are sited near large population areas and when we have a similar situation as is going on in Japan a lot of people are going to get high doses of radiation that will cut their life short. I really don't think we should be taking the chance with nuclear energy. I'm sure its going to be brought to my attention just how much I don't know here shortly but in this case there really isn't a whole lot to know to know that we shouldn't be messing with something that takes on a life of its own as what is going on in Japan shows us so plainly. How long has it been now and they still haven't got it even close to being under control. I doubt that anyone living today will ever actually see it brought under control, as what control is.
This is a pig we should have left in the poke is all I do know for sure.
We as a country need to get our asses in gear and start building alternates and getting them on line as quickly as we can and as we do start taking the more dangerous, ie older nuke plants out first with intention of shutting them all down as soon as is humanly possible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. I agree with that completely.
Job #1 is to focus on deploying wind, solar and EVs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 08:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Job 1 deploying wind, solar and EVs.
job 2 shut the nuke plants down
job 3 shut the coal plants down

In that order too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
diane in sf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-26-11 11:45 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. Put efficiency at the head of that list and I'll agree 100%
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-27-11 06:29 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. My bad
Yes Efficiency should be at the head of that list
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 09:04 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC