Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

(Gov.) Christie’s (R-moran) Dim Outlook for Solar Energy in N.J.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-15-11 04:41 PM
Original message
(Gov.) Christie’s (R-moran) Dim Outlook for Solar Energy in N.J.
http://blogs.wsj.com/metropolis/2011/06/15/christies-dim-outlook-for-solar-energy-in-n-j/?mod=google_news_blog

New Jersey is the second-largest consumer of solar energy in the country, but a draft energy plan introduced last week by Gov. Chris Christie suggests the future is cloudy for the state’s nascent solar industry.

The energy proposal released by the Republican governor discusses solar power in nearly partisan terms. The sector’s costs are described as “socialized” because they are spread out among the bills of all utility customers — even though that’s the case for all types of utility investments. Take, for example, the February proposal by the state’s major utility, Public Service Enterprise Group, to build 1,000 megawatts of natural gas power plants and receive reimbursement via special charges on customers’ bills.

Adam Browning, executive director of Vote Solar, a nonprofit that promotes favorable solar policies, said that “the basic premise behind a utility is in fact a socializing of costs.” He added that when a neighbor buys solar panels and gets a subsidy, “You benefit because peak power costs…are reduced, transmission and distribution investments are reduced and emissions are reduced.”

Christie’s report also says that current support for solar may indicate an “unreasonable transference of wealth from ratepayers at large to solar developers, as well as residential, commercial and industrial participants” and faults the role of government in the solar sector, suggesting that policymakers have had to “pick winners and losers” in the past rather than relying on “the competitive market.”

<more>

The title was correct - "Cristie's Dim" alright

yup
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC