Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Japan’s nuclear embrace is looser but not yet broken

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-18-11 07:01 PM
Original message
Japan’s nuclear embrace is looser but not yet broken
Last week, anti-nuclear campaigners’ hearts beat a little faster when Naoto Kan, the prime minister, announced the abandonment of Japan’s previous target of relying on nuclear power for half of electricity generation by 2030. Plans needed to be discussed “from a clean slate”, he said. So far, however, the Fukushima Daiichi crisis seems to be having less effect on long-term official policy in Japan than it has in distant and geologically stable Germany, where the government is now retreating from plans to delay a phase-out of nuclear power until 2036.

...snip...

While some observers seized on Mr Kan’s remarks as signalling a halt to all of the 14 new reactors planned or under construction, the premier insists no decision has been made on individual projects or the fate of nuclear power in general. There is also much less than meets the eye to the abandonment of the 2030 target, which had depended on hefty cuts in energy consumption and “maximum” use of renewable energy. The reactor construction schedule that the target required included two new units at Fukushima Daiichi that are clearly now impossible to build.

...snip...

On Wednesday, Mr Kan made clear that nuclear power would remain a “pillar” of energy policy. Influential colleagues in his Democratic Party of Japan are already pushing for new reactors to be brought on line as planned. After visiting one northern plant in Aomori prefecture, Katsuya Okada, the DPJ’s secretary-general, noted that its reactor would be ready to operate in only two years. “I don’t think something that is so close to completion should be scrapped,” Mr Okada said.

...snip...

For their part, officials and policymakers take it for granted that there is no choice but to rely on nuclear to reduce resource-poor Japan’s dependence on imported fossil fuels. They say nuclear’s basic generation costs remain far below those of renewables such as solar and wind.

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/04cefa60-816e-11e0-9c83-00144feabdc0.html?ftcamp=rss#axzz1MkeUdnSQ
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC