Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Paradox: Linchpin Of The Long Emergency

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 02:28 PM
Original message
Paradox: Linchpin Of The Long Emergency
Edited on Sun Feb-13-11 02:33 PM by GliderGuider
I've always seen the converging crisis (loosely defined as an interwoven web of problems in our energy supply, ecology and the global economy, all exacerbated by overconsumption, overpopulation and over-corporatism) in terms of paradoxes: at once both a spiritual and secular event, one of enormous opportunities and devastating challenges, with a scale that's both global and local, causes that are at once cultural and personal, with its roots in both technology and philosophy, born out of the coexisting glories and limitations of the human mind. I've long treasured the insights of Carolyn Baker, who has a unique knack for illuminating the nuance and contradiction inherent in our predicament.

Paradox: Linchpin Of The Long Emergency

When people ask me, “Will the Long Emergency happen quickly or slowly?” I answer, “Yes.” When they ask, “Will it be like rolling down a bumpy hill or falling off a cliff?” my answer is “Yes.” My response usually draws laughter or a knowing smile, and then I proceed to explain what I mean as I intend to do in this article. Answering “yes” to such questions underscores the paradox that is at the core of both the questions—and the answers, and without which it will be absolutely, unequivocally impossible to navigate the Long Emergency.

In older, more traditional civilizations preceding our own, one finds a remarkable capacity for embracing paradox. In fact, paradox inhabited the psyches of indigenous cultures as if in their DNA, as exemplified in their art, literature, stories, and other cultural artifacts. It was not until the dawn of modernity, greatly facilitated by Rene Descartes’ dualistic perspective which became increasingly predominate in Western intellectual tradition, that either/or thinking triumphed.

I personally prefer the notion of {the Long Emergency as} a process that is unfolding in roughly three segments, all of which are congealing, convoluting, and complementing each other. The first segment I believe is the collapse of industrial civilization in which we are currently deeply embroiled and which will inevitably intensify. The second would be a period of transition which has also just begun and will also intensify, followed by a Great Turning, in which after a long period of anguish and the decimation of Cartesian dualism, humanity will likely engage collectively in an unprecedented turning from its self-destructive paradigm and for the first time in many millennia, embrace and create infrastructures for living a paradigm that authentically and unequivocally sustains life on earth.

I believe that collapse, transition, and Great Turning are revealing and will reveal the integrated wholeness of the human psyche and the inherent connectivity of all life. The unraveling of the paradigm that has fragmented the psyche and separated us from the transpersonal and the entire earth community is a sacred process, and if we can open to it, instead of resisting or trivializing it, we may have the opportunity to become a wiser, more compassionate, more connected species.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Submariner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
1. The world is polluted with religions
and in concert with democracy (capitalism), our species is breeding like rats. We are already in a state of overpopulation evidenced by the crash of world-wide fisheries, deforestation, and the belching of CO2 into our atmosphere.

I feel we are beyond the point of no return, not enough are listening, many are in denial. And in the end, the human race seems to go to war to work things out.

It will take an international emergency to correct the problem. My guess is that mankind will continue down the yellow brick road oblivious or ignoring the problems, and wait to perish in a super-volcano, like Yellowstone (40 years overdue for an eruption), which will cleanse the planet of all, if not most, of our species.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gregorian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
2. Unrec's ahoy!
Amazing, the denial. This stuff is threatening. Today I tried to make a u-turn. I initiated it while there was no one in sight. Someone came flying along in their car while I was part way through. They had no intention of slowing down, or even stopping for me. Being that I was on a 20,000 pound backhoe, I could have continued on my u-turn, and sliced the top of their car right off. I really wanted to. But in the split second it took for me to realize that the modern mind is arrogant, diseased, unwilling to see their surroundings, I decided to yield to the creep. It's little things like that which show me, at least, the mentality that pervades this society. It has intensified over the last three decades. Most people are in a hurry to go nowhere.

I'm tired of watching the stupidity. And I have zero optimism that it's going to change before shit hits the fan.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-13-11 08:02 PM
Response to Original message
3. The answer is yes
There will be few that do carry on, but really, we are one generation away from being cavemen.

200 years ago, they were many who were moving away from the caves and had come very far and they could survive. But today, among our peers, we are one step away.

Read something about how every 3,600 years earth goes cataclysmic. Seems there is an asteroid belt or some deep space continuum we pass thru.

I think of karma and reincarnation and that the reason we have so many now is because now is the last time for many 3000 years that so many spirits can come and enjoy this garden of Eden.

And I don't plan on leaving til I have too. So move over and share.?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. Cataclysmic?
Edited on Tue Feb-15-11 10:32 AM by BeFree
Perhaps Catastrophic would be a better term?

What I read was that ice cores show, at layers 3600 years apart, spikes in atmospheric deposition upon the ice.

Then there is my whacked 'Spirit' come to life theory. Right? What's up with that? Can it be disproven? Yes, I am looking for a debate. Imagine that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You mean Nibiru?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nibiru_collision

I ain't goin' thataway, nuh uh! The Illuminati would sterilize me...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeFree Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:41 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Is that what it is called?
They say an asteroid killed the dinosaurs, right?

And look at our moon. Pockmarked like a bad case of acne.

Heard that Jupiter had acquired several new moons as of late.

And why wouldn't you want to be sterilized? You don't seem chicken to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 04:45 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Oh thank you so much for that link ...
:spray: :rofl:

You're just trying to tie it back into the "Save the Birds - Eat a Pu Cat" campaign
aren't you?

(cf., "A dog isn't just for Christmas: if sliced thinly enough it will last
until mid-January ...")
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nederland Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-15-11 10:43 AM
Response to Original message
7. If asked if I think this is right or wrong...
...my answer is no.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 12:15 PM
Response to Original message
9. Ah, Yes ... Living the long emergency, ...
It is like watching a slow motion collision between human egotism and the dependence of interactive integral cohabitation with seemingly insignificant parts of the whole. What is so humbling, is realizing there are no insignificant parts of the whole.

Inner peace for some will be, experiencing the activism of an armchair anarchist exercising benevolence, while immunizing despair with a large dose of emotional detachment.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 12:50 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I so get that last sentence.
And I am so conflicted about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Yeah emotional detachment comes at a price, ...
but without it the risk is emotional depression and functional insanity. Depression is a slippery slope ever diving deeper. Then, where is happiness when buried in others' misery?

What we are talking about is another part of Carolyn's paradox. Her last paragraph I believe, struck a chord in me at first reading.

We have both experienced the despair, and ceased to function with effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. Carolyn's last paragraph, ...
Along with the Margaret Wheatley excerpt.

Author and educator, Margaret Wheatley, in her recent book Perseverance, speaks powerfully and paradoxically to the uncertainty of the future and captures the essence of holding the tension of, rather than polarizing, opposites:

Either position, optimism or pessimism, keeps us from fully engaging with the complexity of this time. If we see only troubles, or only opportunities, in both cases we are blinded by our need for certainty, our need to know what’s going on, to figure things out so we can be useful…..

Certainty is a very effective way of defending ourselves from the irresolvable nature of life. If we’re certain, we don’t have to immerse ourselves in the strange, puzzling paradoxes that always characterize a time of upheaval…..

The challenge is to refuse to categorize ourselves. We don’t have to take sides or define ourselves as either optimists or pessimists. Much better to dwell in uncertainty, hold the paradoxes, live in the complexities and contradictions without needing them to resolve.

~~ end excerpt ~~

As we must, hold the tension of, rather than polarizing, our own emotions.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. It's a classic non-dualist position.
The need to come to terms with the paradoxes inherent in the Global Clusterfuck was what got me interested in non-dualism a handful of years ago. It has helped immensely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CRH Donating Member (671 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Feb-16-11 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, for me, ...
duelism is conflicting confusion within inner perceived norms.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC