Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Monarchy Trumps Democracy: Canadian PM Harper's Unelected Senate Rejects Passed Climate Bill

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Nathanael Donating Member (375 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 05:26 PM
Original message
Monarchy Trumps Democracy: Canadian PM Harper's Unelected Senate Rejects Passed Climate Bill
In a move that has generated serious uproar in the Canadian government, the Conservative dominated Senate has defeated a climate change bill that was passed in the House of Commons by holding a snap vote while several Senators were away.

The move is shocking on several fronts. Firstly, the vote took place while 15 Liberal Senators were away from the capital. The vote to defeat the Climate Change Accountability Act passed by a margin of 43-32. Even more shocking is the fact that the unelected body of officials known as the Canadian Senate overturned a bill that was passed by the House of Commons -- government officials elected by the Canadian people.

Jack Layton, the leader of Canada's third party, the New Democratic Party, called the vote, "One of the most undemocratic acts that we have ever seen in the Parliament of Canada."

Link: http://www.energyboom.com/policy/monarchy-trumps-democracy-canadian-prime-minister-harpers-unelected-senate-rejects-passed-cli
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
glinda Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 05:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Serious organizing to rid Harper from the office and to restore proper procedure in Ca.
should be a massive movement in Ca. right now.
Complacency will take you to where the USA is right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Nov-17-10 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. No shit, they are looking to *double* tar sand exploitation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-18-10 05:21 AM
Response to Original message
3. I'm surprised that this was legal
I thought that there had to be a "pairing off" of absentees from
opposing parties precisely to prevent this sort of crooked behaviour?
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:01 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC