Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Scientists find mystery particle

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 06:58 AM
Original message
Scientists find mystery particle
From BBC News:

Scientists have found a sub-atomic particle they cannot explain using current theories of energy and matter. The discovery was made by researchers based at the High Energy Accelerator Research Organisation in Tsukuba. Classified as X(3872), the particle was seen fleetingly in an atom smasher and has been dubbed the "mystery meson". The Japanese team says understanding its existence may require a change to the Standard Model, the accepted theory of the way the Universe is constructed.

X(3872) was found among the decay products of so-called beauty mesons - sub-atomic particles that are produced in large numbers at the Tsukuba "meson factory". It weighs about the same as a single atom of helium and exists for only about one billionth of a trillionth of a second before it decays into other longer-lived, more familiar particles. Although this is extremely short-lived by human standards, scientists say that a billionth of a trillionth of a second is nearly an eternity for a sub-atomic particle this heavy. Particles smaller than the atom are grouped into families depending upon their mass, spin and electric charge. But X(3872) is peculiar in that it does not fit easily into any known particle scheme and, as a result, has attracted a considerable amount of attention from the world's physics community.

Its discovery was recently confirmed by researchers at the Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory in Illinois, US, home of the Tevatron, the world's largest atom smasher. It was the US outfit that gave X(3872) its mystery tag. A normal meson is comprised of a quark and an antiquark held together by the "colour" force, also called the "strong" force because it is the most powerful known in nature. The large variety of meson particles that have been found to date reflect the many different ways that these combinations can be achieved. However, again, X(3872) does not match theoretical expectations for any conceivable quark-antiquark arrangement. To explain it, theoretical physicists may have to modify their theory of the colour force; or make X(3872) the first example of a new type of meson, one that is made from four quarks (two quarks and two antiquarks).

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3277579.stm


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Dogmudgeon Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 07:01 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe it's the God Particle!
Either that or the elusive Higgs Boson.

I got one of each at Wal-Mart. Those bastards!

--bkl
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 07:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
5. "was found among the decay products "
maybe it's Shrub's brain....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
2. Of course
maybe this new particle appeared because the scientists thought it should appear. Thoughts have been known to influence subatomic particles. This is getting really close to the merger of science and mysticism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. How many "strings" make up one of those X fellas?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
4. Size of 2 protons can not be just 2 quarks- so now, we begin, eh?
As they say of string theory, quark theory is so elegant some of it must be true.... sigh

God has a sense of humor that I really do appreciate!

:-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Teaser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-18-03 08:24 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. I distrust string theory
And find the standard model inelegant as hell.

I'm all alone with my Clifford Algebras in explaining everything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 10:38 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC