Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top Five "Biggest Losers" Among Greenland Glaciers - Stunning Graph For Petermann, Zachariae

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 12:07 PM
Original message
Top Five "Biggest Losers" Among Greenland Glaciers - Stunning Graph For Petermann, Zachariae
he recent ice island detachment at Petermann glacier is part of a larger pattern of deglaciation observed at 31/34 glaciers (91%) in our survey.

We just updated our survey to include year 2010. Retreat continues at the 110 km (68 mi) wide Humboldt glacier and at the 23 km (14 mi) wide Zachariae ice stream. Humboldt, Zachariae, and Petermann (16 km or 10 mi wide) have bedrock trenches that lead inland below sea level to the thickest parts of the ice sheet. Sleeping giants are awakening…



Cumulative area change at Greenland’s glacier top 5 “losers”. 2010 areas are measured ~1 month prior to the end of summer melt when the survey usually is made . We do not expect 2010 area changes to be much different using the future data. If anything, we expect the losses to be larger. Click here for a full resolution graphic.

The front areas at Jakobshavn glacier, the world’s overall fastest glacier, and at 79 N glacier, are not losing area in 2010. Jakobshavn area changes are probably less indicative of its stability because the ice is moving so fast it just jams into it’s ice-choked fjord resulting in growth of the front area (see Amundson, Fahnestock, Truffer, Brown, Lüthi and Motyka. 2010. Ice me´lange dynamics and implications for terminus stability, Jakobshavn Isbræ, Greenland. J. Geophys. Res., 115 (F1), 1–12. F01005.). Jakobshavn remains flowing ~2x faster than it was prior to the loss of it’s ice shelf 1997-2003. Ian Howat has likened this glacier to a fire hose spewing about as fast as it can.
The 79 N and Zacharaiae glaciers are outlets to the Northeast Greenland Ice Stream (see: Joughin, Fahnestock, MacAyeal, Bamber, and Gogineni. 2001, Observation and analysis of ice flow in the largest Greenland ice stream, J. Geophys. Res., 106, 34,021–34,034). The northeast ice stream has not accelerated much. If surface climate is any indicator (J. Box is convinced it is), the lesser warming rates in northeast Greenland may partly explain the relative stability.

EDIT

http://bprc.osu.edu/MODIS/?p=103
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-17-10 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. The glacial trenches are below sea level
As the glaciers retreat, wouldn't the sea follow them inland? Melting the Greenland icecap will take a long time. Over time, wouldn't it have the effect of cooling the oceans while the ice melts?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC