Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cuccinelli's Latest Filing On UVA & Michael Mann - It's All A Vast Conspiracy!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 12:36 PM
Original message
Cuccinelli's Latest Filing On UVA & Michael Mann - It's All A Vast Conspiracy!
EDIT

Cuccinelli’s office filed a 41-page brief Tuesday that urges an Albemarle County judge to ignore UVa’s petition to throw out Cuccinelli’s subpoenas and to order UVa to hand over the requested documents, e-mails, data and more. “ … It is clear that there is ample reason to believe that Mann may have committed a violation of FATA while he was at the university,” the filing says. “There is no debate that the university is in possession of documents relevant to determining if such a violation did occur. Accordingly, and for the reasons that follow, the court should deny the university’s petition.”

A sizable section of Cuccinelli’s latest filing questions the integrity of the scientific research behind climate change. The filing spends many pages disputing studies authored by Mann and his colleagues and goes on to suggest that a few dozen leading climate change scientists, including Mann, may have wanted to make global warming appear as a major threat to protect their research funding.

“Not only are they few in number, but through connections with Mann, they formed a mutually supporting and reinforcing group; peer reviewing and co-authoring each other’s papers,” the filing says. “ … Because neither the nor governmental grants to climate scientists would likely continue were it to be determined that man-made global warming was not a serious threat, potential conflicts of interest flow predominantly in one direction.”

EDIT

UVa’s lawyers have also argued that Cuccinelli has no authority to investigate Mann’s research grants because four were from the federal government and consequently not subject to Virginia’s anti-fraud law. The fifth grant, which was funded by UVa, was awarded to Mann in 2001 – two years prior to the enactment of Virginia’s anti-fraud law. Cuccinelli’s filing says there is reason to believe that UVa may have had a hand in administering the four federal grants. The UVa-funded grant, it adds, may be still be subject to Virginia’s anti-fraud law because it may have still been allocating payments after Jan. 1, 2003, when the law went into effect.

EDIT

http://www2.dailyprogress.com/cdp/news/local/local_govtpolitics/article/cuccinelli_academic_freedom_wont_shield_scientist_from_fraud_probe/58161/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:12 PM
Response to Original message
1. Why do us VA taxpayers have to pay for Cuccinelli's partisian War On Science?
Being wrong on some point does not equal fraud. Sadly, Cuccinelli is incapable of understanding scientific method.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bergie321 Donating Member (797 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Because you guys elected him
At least you don't have Jan Brewer who was thrust upon us after Obama took our Napolitano.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 07:47 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. That and the fact that public officials are well shielded against any sort of ethics in America
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FSogol Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-15-10 07:43 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. You guys? Them's fighting words.
McDonnell and Cuccinelli both have national aspirations. Their policies must be ridiculed and stopped at every turn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Viking12 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-14-10 01:39 PM
Response to Original message
2. At least he's keeping us safe from exposure to nipples
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 04:26 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC