Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Yak, Snap, Snarl - World "Leaders" Go Round And Round On Climate At Davos

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Feb-04-10 01:14 PM
Original message
Yak, Snap, Snarl - World "Leaders" Go Round And Round On Climate At Davos
EDIT

South Korean President Lee Myung-bak said everyone could agree on targets for cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 but no one could agree on 2020. "Everyone can agree in the far distant future when everyone has gone," he told the Davos forum. Mexican President Felipe Calderon admitted there were "low expectations" for the next big US climate change conference he is due to host in Cancun late this year.

So climate change became a second or third order issue at the Davos forum, which ended on Sunday, drowned out by uncertainty over the vigour of the North Atlantic economic pickup and the rancour of the anti-banking backlash. Sitting on huge deposits of carbon-intensive oil sands, Canada's Harper argued that trying to move ahead of the capacity to shift to low-emissions technology would threaten economic growth and jobs. "It is very difficult to lower emissions growth," he said. "There is a lot of demand for targets or other actions, whether it's on developed countries or developing countries, that will have significant impacts on their economies. Everyone talks as though to recognise the economic problem is some kind of failing."

Harper argued that the task of a longer-term technological fix would not be helped by trying to pretend there was no shorter-term economic hit. "People set targets and don't meet them," he said.

Mexico's Calderon snapped back: "There are economic costs tackling climate change. "Nevertheless, we need to recognise that the consequences of global warming in the future, the opportunity cost of that, could be higher in economic terms. "The costs of doing nothing will be much higher than taking action today."

EDIT

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/features/climate-of-davos-despair/story-e6frg6z6-1225826879579
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC