Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

World view: Out of service—Decaying infrastructure is an urgent threat…

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:18 PM
Original message
World view: Out of service—Decaying infrastructure is an urgent threat…
http://www.nature.com/news/2009/091216/full/462846a.html
Published online 16 December 2009 | Nature 462, 846 (2009) | doi:10.1038/462846a

Column

World view: Out of service

Decaying infrastructure is an urgent threat that scientists and engineers must help to address, says Colin Macilwain.

Colin Macilwain

The trappings of our civilization, from flushing the toilet to posting flip comments on Twitter, rely on a set of critical infrastructures. Many of these — water systems, transport links, electricity grids and generating plants — are ageing severely in developed countries. And the ones that aren't ageing, such as mobile communications and the Internet, are of unknown resilience.

The sudden collapse of a bridge on Interstate 35 in Minneapolis, Minnesota, on 1 August 2007, like the cascade power failure that swept the northeastern United States four years earlier, was a portent of what could come to European and Asian nations if they allow their physical infrastructure to deteriorate.

The US power failure also showed the extent to which rich nations' infrastructure has evolved into a complex web of interdependence, which no one has sought to model properly and for which no authority has overall responsibility. Energy supply, for example, is critical to the operation of all the other infrastructures and is itself dependent on water supply and telecoms.

"The major change over the last 50 years has been the gradual, but ultimately seismic, shift" to an interconnected national infrastructure, where "failure in one part has a direct and damaging knock-on effect in others", noted a scathing report on the topic published earlier this year by the UK Council for Science and Technology (CST), the senior science-advisory body to the British government.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Dec-17-09 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Who the hell needs infrastructure? We've got more important things to
spend on, like WAR. And bailouts for banking criminals.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC