Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Another blow to Peak Oil

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-27-09 11:35 AM
Original message
Another blow to Peak Oil
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/us-oil-production-to-rise-the-most-in-39-years-2009-11-27

" This year's U.S. crude oil production is on track to show its biggest year-on-year jump since 1970, an analysis of historical data by Platts showed Friday. If the 5.268 million barrels a day of average production level, recorded in the first ten months of the year, holds through December, this year's output will rise 6.4% from 2008, the Platts analysis of Energy Information Administration data showed. This year's production level will be the highest since 2004, when output averaged 5.419 million barrels a day. Peak oil production was recorded in 1970, when the U.S. produced 9.637 million barrels of oil."

The comments are a laugh riot. N.B., the U.S. consumes approximately 21 million barrels of oil every day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
bbinacan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-27-09 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. Interesting. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-27-09 12:36 PM
Response to Original message
2. I'm unclear on your point.
Given that "Peak Oil" speaks to the question of how much new oil is
discovered versus how much oil is produced, what do you think is
being proven simply by citing high production numbers? How much
oil the oil companies decide to pump out of the ground during any
given year has very little to do with the question of whether the
age of cheap oil has passed.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pscot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-27-09 08:01 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. Yes
I know that. You know that. The headline reflected the tone of many of the comments generated by the story. It was meant as an ironic juxtaposition. This rsponse is meta-irony. I should know better. I'm afraid I'm just incorrigible, but it's a way of staying sane in a world that no longer makes any sense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-27-09 12:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. Rise in US production doesn't cover the DROP in worldwide production.
Cantarell in Mexico is in terminal collapse, and many of the world's largest fields are in decline. Yes, it's nice that US production has temporarily picked up by more intensive extraction, but there have not been any significant new discoveries, and intensive extraction only increases the rate depletion in the long run, exhausting the remaining well faster.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bhikkhu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-27-09 11:41 PM
Response to Original message
5. If I weren't broke, I'd go buy a Hummer
I did read a little about an increase (predicted by the EIA), but no good info on the source of it. New Gulf of Mexico projects coming online?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri Apr 26th 2024, 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC