Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unchecked Climate change will put world at ‘tipping point’, WWF and Allianz report says

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 03:28 PM
Original message
Unchecked Climate change will put world at ‘tipping point’, WWF and Allianz report says
http://www.panda.org/?181342/Unchecked-Climate-change-will-put-world-at-tipping-point-WWF-and-Allianz-report-says

Unchecked Climate change will put world at ‘tipping point’, WWF and Allianz report says

Berlin, 23rd November 2009 – The world’s diverse regions and ecosystems are close to reaching temperature thresholds – or “tipping points” – that can unleash devastating environmental, social and economic changes, according to a new report by WWF and Allianz.

Often global warming is seen as a process similar to a steady flow of water in our bathrooms and kitchens, where temperature goes up gradually, controlled by a turn of the tap.

But the report ‘Major Tipping Points in the Earth’s Climate System and Consequences for the Insurance Sector’ documents that changes related to global warming are likely to be much more abrupt and unpredictable – and they could create huge social and environmental problems and cost the world hundreds of billions of dollars.

Without immediate climate action, sea level rise on the East Coast of the USA, the shift to an arid climate in California, disturbances of the Indian Summer Monsoon in India and Nepal or the dieback of the Amazon rainforest due to increasing drought, are likely to affect hundreds millions of people and cost hundreds of billions of dollars.

The study explores impacts of these “tipping points,” including their economic consequences and implications for the insurance sector. It also shows how close the world is to reaching “tipping points” in many regions of the world, or how close we are to tipping the scales toward disaster.

“If we don’t take immediate action against climate change, we are in grave danger of disruptive and devastating changes,” said Kim Carstensen, the Head of WWF Global Climate Initiative. “Reaching a tipping point means losing something forever. This must be a strong argument for world leaders to agree a strong and binding climate deal in Copenhagen in December.

According to the report, carried out by the Tyndall Centre, the impacts of passing “Tipping Points” on the livelihood of people and economic assets have been underestimated so far. The report focuses on regions and phenomena where such events might be expected to cause significant impacts within the first half of the century.

“As an insurer and investor, we must prepare our clients for these scenarios as long as we still have leeway for action,” says Clemens von Weichs, CEO of Allianz Reinsurance. “Setting premiums risk-appropriately and sustainably is of vital interest to everyone involved, because this is the only way to ensure that coverage solutions will continue to exist.”

Allianz intends to address climate change by entering into dialogue with its clients at an early date. This will allow it to point out countermeasures in a timely way, and work together to develop specific coverage concepts, whether for existing assets or for future climate-compatible projects like alternative energy and water supply concepts, dyke construction, or protection against failed harvests.

Global temperatures have already risen by at least 0.7 degrees Celsius. Global warming above 2-3 degrees in the second half of the century is likely unless strong extremely radical and determined efforts towards deep cuts in emissions are put in place before 2015.

The melting of the Greenland (GIS) and the West Antarctic Ice Shield (WAIS) could lead to a Tipping Point scenario, possibly a sea level rise of up to 0.5 meters by 2050. This is estimated to increase the value of assets at threat in all 136 global port mega-cities by around 25.000 billion USD.

On the North-eastern coast of the USA and due to a localized anomaly, the sea level could rise up to 0.65 meters, increasing the asset exposure from 1.350 to about 7.400 billion USD

The South Western Part of the USA, namely California, is likely to be affected by droughts and levels of aridity similar to the Dust Bowl in the 1930s. The annual damages caused by wildfires could be tenfold compared to today’s costs and could reach up to 2.5 billion USD per year by 2050 increasing to up to 14 billion by 2085.

70 percent of working population may be put at risk by droughts in India. The future costs of droughts are expected to rise to approx. 40 billion USD per decade until the middle of the century.

In a tipping point scenario, dieback of the Amazon Rainforest could reach 70% by the end of the century as a consequence of a significant increase in the frequency of droughts in the Amazon basin. The impacts include loss of biodiversity and massive carbon release. Costs could reach up to 9.000 billion USD for a surface of around 4 million square kilometers.

“The Tipping Points report shows how quickly we are approaching dangerous and irreversible levels of global warming,” Carstensen said. “Economic consequences of passing the climate tipping points are absolutely overwhelming.”

“There is still a chance to avoid the worst and this report shows how urgent it is to act immediately. A strong climate agreement in Copenhagen in December is the best, if not the only chance to prevent the worst impacts of devastating climate change.”

Today’s insurance industry has learned lessons from its experiences after major losses caused by hurricanes like Andrew (1992), Ivan (2004) and Katrina (2005). Better models will help people understand the frequency and strength of natural disasters. “But good models will not be enough to protect the climate,” explains Michael Bruch, of Allianz Global Corporate & Specialty, the Allianz Group’s industrial insurer. “The human component is playing an ever-increasing role in reducing the risk from natural disasters, in terms of both risk management and combating the human causes of climate change.”

Download

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. The scary part is that these statements are made with increasingl knowledge of the problem.
People will look back and say "Why didn't they do something? They knew what would happen!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:08 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. What should get people’s attention is that we’re talking about an insurance company
When an insurance company talks about unacceptable risk, people should take notice.

I mean, sure… the ecologists, and egg-head scientists we can ignore… but, when the insurance companies get into the act, hey… this may be serious!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. But I read some emails that suggested the whole science of climate change was wrong!
Clearly that's more indicative!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. On top of that, some of the emails dealt with numbers, or something very similar to numbers!
Obviously, it's just some cobbled-together mess of numbers masquerading as some sort of "science".

Hmmph!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:21 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. “It’s fuzzy math!”
Edited on Mon Nov-23-09 06:23 PM by OKIsItJustMe
“Look, this is a man, he’s got great numbers. He talks about numbers. I’m beginning to think not only did he invent the Internet, but he invented the calculator. It’s fuzzy math.”

— George W. Bush

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-23-09 06:28 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. This is why the comics miss "the shrub"!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Nihil Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 04:41 AM
Response to Reply #2
7. As many have noted here before ...
... it is only when people start putting a $ cost on the effects that
anyone (other than the "ecology nuts") pays attention ...

I think it might wake up a few people when the insurance companies
whack up the premiums (or simply refuse coverage in the worst areas).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 05:10 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Unfortunately, given that the cost to prevent as so high, they just put their heads in the sand.
We have a bit of that on these very forums.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 10:39 AM
Response to Reply #7
13. Investors push SEC on climate-risk disclosure
http://www.reuters.com/article/GCA-GreenBusiness/idUSTRE5AM4LV20091123

Investors push SEC on climate-risk disclosure

Mon Nov 23, 2009 5:23pm EST

By Rachelle Younglai

WASHINGTON (Reuters) - Pension funds and other investors holding more than $1 trillion of assets renewed their call to U.S. regulators on Monday to require companies to disclose climate-related risks.

Institutional investors, including the biggest U.S. public pension fund, petitioned the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission to issue guidance telling companies to include risks related to climate change in their quarterly and annual filings.

"This is calling for real transparency on material risks that have a profound impact on share value of companies," said Mindy Lubber, president of Ceres, a group of investors and environmentalists that organized the petition to the SEC.

"These are now real on-balance sheet risks. They are material. They ought to be disclosed," she said.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
n2doc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:46 AM
Response to Original message
9. I believe we have already tipped off the edge
And are rapidly accelerating towards our new, hotter, world. There is a strong psychological imperative to believe "there's still time to stop it and go back". No, there isn't and we have proven over and over that we are too short sighted a species to do anything about it. Those who can plan for a hot, dry future should so so before global panic sets it. You have about 10, maybe 20, years to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. I'm planning for 10 years.
The problem is that there are a number of tipping points happening that all interlock, with climate, energy and economic issues being foremost. None of these make the problem any easier to solve or less likely to occur. When we add in a variety of global social pressures and it's clear we face very interesting times.

It's hard for me to imagine that "the edge" is more than 10 years away, but maybe that's just a failure of my imagination.

The root problem we face is not technical. It's a social/perceptual problem, born out of our evolved neuro-psychology and our current cultural story.

Time's about up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 10:05 AM
Response to Reply #10
12. I still cannot agree that the problem is caused by our “evolved neuro-psychology”
Our brains are not the problem. However, they may be the solution.

The “http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Oxygenation_Event">oxygen catastrophe” was not caused by “evolved neuro-psychology” it was caused by the overwhelming success of creatures who produced far too much waste, and poisoned their own ecosystem.

It sounds quite similar. The important difference, is that (thanks to our “evolved neuro-psychology”) we are capable of comprehending what we have done, and perhaps addressing it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GliderGuider Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 10:42 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. The main problem is our cultural story.
The triune brain adds wrinkles like the herding instinct and the hyperbolic discount function. I've come to see that those are essentially value neutral though, in that they simply provide the psychological framework within which our story plays out. However, given our current global risk status, the inability to respond strongly to abstract threats (the discount function) and our tendency to stay close to the "common wisdom" (our herding instinct) don't seem to be doing us any favours.

Our current cultural story tells us that continuing growth is OK, that we are smart enough to solve any problem that becomes bad enough, and that we have yet to encounter a civilization-busting problem, so none exist. In that context, our difficulties with risk discounts and herding behaviour are positively ominous. Now, if we manage to change our cultural story to include elements of interdependence with nature, the dangers of growth and an acceptance of limits, some of those tendencies (for sure the herding instinct) could work to our favour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 11:46 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Re: The main problem is our (current) cultural story.
This I can agree with.

It’s not an inherent flaw in the species, it’s a flaw in our culture.

“My” area was once inhabited by the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iroquois">Iroquois, whose “cultural story” is commercialized by “http://www.seventhgeneration.com/about">Seventh Generation.”
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Nov-24-09 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
11. I understand (and sympathize) but the ecosystem is very complex
There are many sub-systems, and many tipping points…

We are constantly being reminded of the things we do not know…
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 16th 2024, 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC