Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Nature - The Entangled Bank Unravels

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-19-09 01:19 PM
Original message
Nature - The Entangled Bank Unravels
"It is interesting to contemplate an entangled bank, clothed with many plants of many kinds, with birds singing on the bushes, with various insects flitting about, and with worms crawling through the damp earth." So Charles Darwin begins the concluding paragraph of On the Origin of Species, published 150 years ago next week. By invoking this gentle image, Darwin sought to emphasize how "endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful" have all evolved through the process of natural selection. Were he alive today, Darwin would have cause to be less rhapsodic. The modern version of his bank might well be dominated by invasive shrubs, having been denuded of most native plants by deforestation, and nearby streams would probably be polluted and filled with sediment from excess run-off.

It is hardly news that the rich pageant of life, which inspired Darwin and his work, is now suffering. According to data released this month by the International Union for Conservation of Nature in its Red List of Threatened Species, one-fifth of mammals and nearly one-third of amphibians are threatened with extinction, and the situation is no better among plants: almost one-third of known gymnosperms, the group that includes conifers, are threatened. Yet despite all the warnings from scientists and environmentalists, nations have done little more than fret over the problem. Although almost 200 countries have pledged through the Convention on Biological Diversity to significantly reduce the rate of biodiversity loss by next year, leaders of that effort acknowledge not only that the world will come up short of this target, but also that it was basically unachievable from the start and that it represented more of a political statement (see page 263).

EDIT

Climate change will place new stresses on already weakened ecosystems but it can also present political and economic opportunities. One example is a strategy known as reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD). According to estimates by the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, the clearing of forests accounts for approximately one-fifth of greenhouse-gas emissions by humans. Thus, stopping deforestation could be a relatively cheap and effective way to reduce emissions and slow the rate of global warming. At the same time, argue Will Turner and his colleagues in an Opinion piece on page 278, efforts to preserve natural ecosystems can help to ameliorate some of the effects of climate change. The international climate treaty currently under negotiation is likely to include a REDD mechanism that would provide funds to tropical countries to save their forests, a move that would help to mitigate climate change and sustain biodiversity.

Although ecosystem degradation looks set to increase in the future as a result of climate change, the biggest threat to biodiversity today is the rapid disappearance of habitats. At present, only around 14% of land surface and less than 6% of territorial seas are protected worldwide. Yet such areas help to support nearly one-sixth of the world's population, according to the TEEB study. As nations look beyond the likely failure of the 2010 biodiversity target, they should commit to placing more areas under protection. It will be crucial to select valuable sites that harbour the species that are most threatened. The wealthiest sectors of society tend to be the most removed from nature, whereas the world's poorest people rely heavily on the fruits of diverse ecosystems. As a result, care must be taken to ensure that conservation initiatives do not come at the expense of people, particularly indigenous communities that can be indirectly harmed when land is suddenly set aside.

EDIT/END

http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v462/n7271/full/462251a.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC