Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

DOE To Abandon Yucca Licensing Effort Next Month

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:02 PM
Original message
DOE To Abandon Yucca Licensing Effort Next Month
I'm glad Obama is keeping his promise on ending this money pit.
http://www.theenergydaily.com/Yucca/

November 9, 2009
DOE To Abandon Yucca Licensing Effort Next Month

BY JEFF BEATTIE

The Energy Department plans to abandon next month its Yucca Mountain license application pending before the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, according to internal DOE documents obtained by The Energy Daily, a move intended to bury the proposed Nevada nuclear waste repository for good.

In the meantime, sources say the White House and DOE have been engaged in considerable debate over whom to name to a “blue ribbon” panel that Energy Secretary Steven Chu is forming to identify waste disposal alternatives to the Yucca project, which President Obama says is unsafe.

Rumored candidates for the panel include former National Security Advisor Brent Scowcroft; former Rep. Lee Hamilton (D-Ind.); former Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chairman Shirley Jackson, who is currently president of Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute; and University of California astrophysics professor George Smoot, who some say Chu has favored to chair the panel.

DOE’s accelerating effort to wind down Yucca Mountain is made clear by draft DOE documents obtained by The Energy Daily last week on the agency’s fiscal year 2011 budget. The documents show DOE will request only $46.2 million for Yucca in fiscal 2011—all of it aimed at closing the project.

<snip>

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
izquierdista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:06 PM
Response to Original message
1. "Round up the usual suspects!"
Is there no blue ribbon panel that Brent Scowcroft and Lee Hamilton can't improve?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluestateguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:07 PM
Response to Original message
2. Dump it in Oklahoma
nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greennina Donating Member (295 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. There's not enough people there to make sick...
to make it worthwhile for the government. They'll find somewhere with a much denser population to dump it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 07:22 AM
Response to Reply #2
9. Easy now
not all of us are inhofesandcoburns :-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Massacure Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:08 PM
Response to Original message
3. So instead of storing all of our nuclear waste in one location...
We are going to store it in 110.

How does everybody feel about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. The waste has to be stored on-site for several decades anyway.
Edited on Thu Nov-12-09 10:42 PM by bananas
1) Yucca Mountain wouldn't open for at least ten years
2) There's already more waste than would fit in it,
so we'd need to dig several more depositories
3) There's so much waste, it will take several decades to move it all

So, the waste has to be stored on-site for several decades anyway.

edit to add: How do you feel about that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. Good. Used nuclear fuel is way to valuable to dump it.
You'd have to know science to know that, but this fuel is a precious resource for future generations to use once the anti-science ignorance of the anti-nuke religious cults is done killing people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. *** the precious ***

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NNadir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Nov-12-09 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. This is definitely at the level of your mentality. In fact, fundie boy, you cannot
produce even ONE case of injury from used nuclear fuel and clearly don't give a rat's ass about how many people DIE from dangerous fossil fuel waste EVERY DAY.

Since you are unfamiliar with the contents of the scientific literature, you also know zero about mutagenicity of dangerous fossil fuel waste.

You would not know the geometry of a PAH or how it interacts with DNA because you just don't care, don't know a damn thing about SAR or any other subject.

EVERY SINGLE MEMBER of the anti-nuke cult has a cartoon view of energy punctuated by cartoonish stupidity.

History will have a way of recording what these cults have done by the way and I assure you that the place for this cult will be even worse than the place reserved for another anti-science bigot Urban VIII.

Afterall, Urban VIII's anti-science didn't actually kill people. Yours does. Every. damn. day.

http://www.who.int/entity/quantifying_ehimpacts/countryprofilesebd.xls">World Health Organization Statistics on Deaths From Dangerous Fossil Fuel Waste and Biomass Waste.

How about some more dumb fundie giggles for the dead?

No?

Couldn't care less about the dead from the providers of the payoffs by dangerous fossil fuel companies to your pal Amory Lovins?

I thought so.

Have a nice immoral dumb fundie scientifically illiterate day.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madokie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-13-09 07:29 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. With you it all boils down to Amory Lovins
He gets paid and you don't because no one wants to buy your wares and that pisses you off. Is that a correct statement???

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC