Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Lomborg & Economists - Unproven, Massive Geoengineering Schemes Better Approach Than Carbon Tax

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 12:13 PM
Original message
Lomborg & Economists - Unproven, Massive Geoengineering Schemes Better Approach Than Carbon Tax
Because as we all know, you can never never never never never NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER EVER increase taxes, because that would be BAD and there might be unforseen economic consequences to doing so.

GENEVA (Reuters) - "Climate engineering" projects, such as spraying seawater into the sky to dim sunlight, would be a more effective brake on global warming than increasing taxes on energy, a group of economists said on Friday.

Led by Bjorn Lomborg, a Danish statistician and author of "The Skeptical Environmentalist," a book which questioned orthodox environmental views, the group ranked "cloud whitening" as a top option in combating climate change. "Climate engineering could provide a cheap, rapid and effective response to global warming," the economists said.

Lomborg's panel ranked research into "marine cloud whitening technology" -- having boats spray seawater droplets into the sky to create clouds -- as the best of 21 ideas reviewed.

They ranked more research into clean energy such as solar and wind power second, ahead of research into spewing tiny dust-like particles high into the atmosphere to block sunlight and research into burying greenhouse gases. Among the least promising solutions, the group said that: "carbon taxes would be an expensive, ineffective way to reduce the suffering from global warming."

EDIT

http://www.reuters.com/article/environmentNews/idUSTRE58307720090904
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Sep-04-09 03:21 PM
Response to Original message
1. Heck, I thought I read recently that Lomborg was now in favor of a carbon tax...
...but maybe I'm misremembering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC