Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

U.S. energy use drops in 2008

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:49 PM
Original message
U.S. energy use drops in 2008
https://publicaffairs.llnl.gov/news/news_releases/2009/NR-09-07-02.html


News Release

Contact: Anne M. Stark
Phone: (925) 422-9799
E-mail: stark8@llnl.gov FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
July 20, 2009
NR-09-07-02

U.S. energy use drops in 2008

LIVERMORE, Calif. - Americans used more solar, nuclear, biomass and wind energy in 2008 than they did in 2007, according to the most recent energy flow charts released by the Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. The nation used less coal and petroleum during the same time frame and only slightly increased its natural gas consumption. Geothermal energy use remained the same.

The estimated U.S. energy use in 2008 equaled 99.2 quadrillion BTUs (“quads”), down from 101.5 quadrillion BTUs in 2007. (A BTU or British Thermal Unit is a unit of measurement for energy, and is equivalent to about 1.055 kilojoules).

Energy use in the industrial and transportation sectors declined by 1.17 and 0.9 quads respectively, while commercial and residential use slightly climbed. The drop in transportation and industrial use — which are both heavily dependent on petroleum — can be attributed to a spike in oil prices in summer 2008.

Last year saw a significant increase in biomass with the recent push for the development of more biofuels including ethanol.

“This is a good snapshot of what's going on in the country. Some of the year-to year changes in supply and consumption can be traced to factors such as the economy and energy policy,” said A.J. Simon, an LLNL energy systems analyst who develops the energy flow charts using data provided by the Department of Energy's Energy Information Administration.

Simon said the increase in wind energy can be attributed to large investments in wind turbine technologies over the last few years as well as better use of the existing turbines.

Nuclear energy also saw a slight increase from 8.41 quads in 2007 up to 8.45 quads in 2008. While no new nuclear power plants came online in 2008, the existing plants had less down time. Over the last 20 years, the downtime for maintenance and refueling at nuclear power plants had been decreasing.

“There's an incentive to operate as much as possible,” Simon said. “It's a smart thing to do. You can't earn revenue by selling electricity when you're down.”

Many years of experience have allowed nuclear operators to optimize plant reliability on short maintenance cycles.

The chart also shows the amount of energy rejected by the United States. Of the 99.2 quads consumed, only 42.15 ended up as energy services. Energy services are “things that make our lives better,” Simon said. “That's the energy that makes your car move and that comes out of your light bulb.”

The ratio of energy services to the total amount of energy used is a measure of the country's energy efficiency. The remainder, explained Simon, “is simply rejected. For example, some rejected energy shows up as waste heat from power plants.”

“I'm really excited about the renewed push for energy efficiency in this country,” he said. “Because once that energy is rejected, it's no longer useful.

But more efficient power plants, automobiles and even light bulbs really do reject less energy while providing the same energy services.”

Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has helped to visualize the Energy Information Administration's U.S. energy data since the early 1970s.

Founded in 1952, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory has a mission to ensure national security and to apply science and technology to the important issues of our time. Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory is managed by Lawrence Livermore National Security, LLC, for the U.S. Department of Energy’s National Nuclear Security Administration.

More Information:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Deja Q Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:50 PM
Response to Original message
1. And devices that use less to begin with.
Macs use less than PCs... sorry to use the M-word again, but it's still true.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PDJane Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 12:53 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. It is true........
On the other hand, the manufacture of Macs is not energy efficient and they use more aggressive greenhouse gas and rare earth in production, and those materials aren't recycled.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. Everything's Relative: Get Greenpeace's most recent reports
Edited on Mon Jul-20-09 01:23 PM by OKIsItJustMe
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 01:12 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. I'm a great fan of Macs (been using them since 1985) but please don't oversell them
http://www.apple.com/environment/energyefficiency/
http://www.apple.com/pr/library/2009/03/03consumer.html
http://www.energystar.gov/index.cfm?fuseaction=find_a_product.showProductGroup&pgw_code=CO

As efficient as a Mac may be (relative to some MS-Windows computers) a computer which is turned off uses much less energy. I've noticed that Apple has been making it less and less obvious where the power button is on their computers (starting with the G4 iMac.)

My assumption has been that when customers started complaining about how long a modern computer takes to "boot" manufacturers (including Apple) said, "Then don't turn 'em off! Just let 'em go to sleep!"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 01:05 PM
Response to Original message
3. Now, if we just maintain this depression for the next few decades, we might slow global warming
Hooray!! :sarcasm:

Seriously though, why didn't they mention anything about the economic collapse when explaining the decrease in energy consumption?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OKIsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jul-20-09 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. "why didn't they mention anything about the economic collapse?"
Edited on Mon Jul-20-09 01:41 PM by OKIsItJustMe
You mean something like this:


Energy use in the industrial and transportation sectors declined by 1.17 and 0.9 quads respectively, while commercial and residential use slightly climbed. The drop in transportation and industrial use — which are both heavily dependent on petroleum — can be attributed to a spike in oil prices in summer 2008.



Remember that a great deal of the "collapse" has taken place in 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gwashington2650 Donating Member (50 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-23-09 04:11 AM
Response to Original message
7. Good
Hopefully this trend will continue.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC