Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Oops! Queensland Oil Spill Not 30 Tons, But 250 Tons - Bloomberg

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 12:30 PM
Original message
Oops! Queensland Oil Spill Not 30 Tons, But 250 Tons - Bloomberg
March 16 (Bloomberg) -- Swire Shipping, operator of a ship that last week leaked fuel oil, coating beaches in Australia’s Queensland, denied media reports it lied about the amount of fuel lost, which is about 10 times more than initially believed.

The container ship’s officers and the authorities were initially unaware that a second fuel tank had been punctured in the accident, Swire said in an e-mailed statement. The captain of the MV Pacific Adventurer yesterday surrendered his passport to the authorities, Queensland Deputy Premier Paul Lucas said.

The Queensland government yesterday said about 250 metric tons of heavy fuel oil may have been spilled by the ship in a storm, up from initial estimates of between 20 and 30 tons. More than half of the oil-affected areas on two islands and parts of the Sunshine Coast tourist area have been cleaned, Lucas said yesterday.

The accident occurred when 31 containers carrying ammonium nitrate washed overboard in rough seas whipped up by Tropical Cyclone Hamish, piercing the hull of the Pacific Adventurer on the port side. The ship’s officers only discovered a second hole, in the starboard fuel tank, once the vessel had docked in the Brisbane River, Swire, a unit of London-based John Swire & Sons Ltd., said in the March 15 statement.

EDIT

http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601081&sid=af.0d.d.Mbpg&refer=australia
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 12:42 PM
Response to Original message
1. It's a shame that meteorologists can't predict bad weather and rough seas.
If they could, the tanker could have detoured.

:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes, but they're scientists, and as we all know, "Scientists don't really know . . . "
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-16-09 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Yes, weather predicting is only a theory.
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC