Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UC Davis Study - California Drought Could Eliminate 80,000 More Ag. Jobs This Year Alone - SJMN

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:40 PM
Original message
UC Davis Study - California Drought Could Eliminate 80,000 More Ag. Jobs This Year Alone - SJMN
Edited on Mon Mar-02-09 01:41 PM by hatrack
The farmers who will be slammed the hardest are those who depend on the Central Valley Project, the massive federal system of dams, reservoirs, pumps and canals that helped spawn California's $36 billion farming industry — the state's largest. Within a couple of years, Coburn says, numerous small towns like Firebaugh could die and hundreds of thousands of once-profitable acres could turn into fields of dust. Beginning today, the federal water spigot in California has been turned off for the first time. And just as in "Armageddon,'' the game might be over.

Across the Central Valley, warns a new University of California-Davis study, 80,000 jobs could be lost this year. In Firebaugh, a historic town of 7,000, one of the first casualties could be the Silver Creek Almond Co., which Coburn co-founded five years ago to pack and market the almonds he grows on 1,500 acres.

All of the water used to nourish Coburn's orchards comes from the Central Valley Project. And on Feb. 20, federal water officials announced a "zero allocation'' to farmers — most likely for the rest of the year. Farmers who depend on water from the State Water Project are only slightly luckier — they have been told their allocation will be 15 percent of normal.

"In a few years this will all be gone,'' Coburn predicted as he walked through a cavernous warehouse stacked with bins containing 10 million pounds of almonds, about 70 percent of which will be sent overseas. "Think of the business that will be lost at the Port of Oakland,'' Coburn said. "This is all going toward reducing our trade deficit.''

EDIT

http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_11803992?source=most_viewed


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. they left the dust bowl and moved to the land of milk and honey
now several generations later their descendent's face another..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moundsview Donating Member (150 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 02:02 PM
Response to Original message
2. Is the point of this study
that a man made eco-system to turn the desert into farm land is unsustainable? I don't think that the Almond trees being grown are native to the area are they? Probably a case of too many people making demands on a naturally limited supple of water.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jwirr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
3. Those 80,000 jobs are also jobs that are not likely to come back in
that location. I would suspect that most of the produce raised on these California farms will be grown somewhere in the midwest from now on. But that means drastic change and water is only one part of the problem - global warming also brings hot weather and new pests to these areas not to mention the energy needs that will become in short supply in the future. The best idea is still localize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tumbulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Mar-02-09 11:10 PM
Response to Original message
4. the almonds replaced a whole lot of cotton
that was a real low income producer per acre crop. The farmers used lots of ag chemicals to grow it and so, IMO the trees are a much better crop. Almonds use much less water than cotton, plus most of them are irrigated with drip systems. All better. And not that many ag chemicals are used, compared to cotton, that is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 11:06 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC