Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

No! The Economist (!) NotesThat Australia's Wildfires May Be Linked To Climate Changes!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:39 AM
Original message
No! The Economist (!) NotesThat Australia's Wildfires May Be Linked To Climate Changes!
:eyes:

A WEEK after bushfires started blazing across parts of southern Australia, the country was still coming to grips with one of the most traumatic events in its peacetime history. The fires that erupted on February 7th in Victoria, the second-most populous state, killed more than 180 people. Police say the toll could reach 300. The final count will be left to authorities with the grim task of sifting through landscapes blackened by flames so ferocious that they melted car parts and devoured buildings in seconds.

In one of Australia’s hottest summer seasons on record, about 50 fires also raged across New South Wales, the most populous state, without loss of life. But it was neighbouring Victoria that bore the most devastating brunt. The state is prone to hot winds driving in from deserts, fanning flames whose “scale and savagery”, says Stephen Pyne, an American fire expert, “have no equal elsewhere on earth.”

This week’s fires easily outstripped the worst two previous ones: “Black Friday” in January 1939, when 71 people died in Victoria; and “Ash Wednesday” in February 1983, which took 75 lives in Victoria and neighbouring South Australia. This time, a prolonged drought gripping south-east Australia, and temperatures staying above 40°C for days, made for a lethally dry terrain to fuel the flames.

EDIT

Debate has started, too, about the fire’s intensity. Some are linking Australia’s heatwave and decade-long drought to climate change. In a report to Mr Rudd’s government late last year Ross Garnaut, an economist, forecast that the number of days each year in Melbourne hotter than 35°C will rise from nine now to 21 in 2070. He said fire seasons were projected to start earlier, end later and be more intense. Mr Rudd has promised that shattered townships will be rebuilt “brick by brick”. It may also be worth considering precisely where and how they should be built.

EDIT

http://www.economist.com/world/asia/displaystory.cfm?story_id=13109772
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:40 AM
Response to Original message
1. The Economist has been on the Global Warming bandwagon for a while.
They have had some very good articles about the failures of the EU in actually doing anything. (All talk very little real action)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tekisui Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. "Global warming bandwagon"?
You think its just a hoax or a fad?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lost in CT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. No I don't... Sorry for an apparent poor choice of words. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rurallib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
4. While the world focuses on Australian fires, don't forget the USA
is probably headed for yet another disastrous fire season. Fire season used to be June to October or so. I believe it has probably already started in some areas. The US has lost million and millions of acres in the past several years. Snow cover in the mountains out west is down again. So batten down the hatches. I hope people have prepared and I fear for the wildlife.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stray cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 11:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. I thought arson was to blame?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
XemaSab Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
6. My question:
Have Australians moved out into the bush in larger numbers, or are the fires really worse than they were in '39? :shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:51 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. By all accounts, these are the worst fires ever, along with highest temperatures ever
I have little doubt that it's the first great climate-change disaster of the 21st century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barrett808 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-14-09 04:55 PM
Response to Original message
8. Recent study shows wildfires correlated with rapid climate change:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC