Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Seabrook Station not ready for McCain's nuclear plans

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
jpak Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 04:42 PM
Original message
Seabrook Station not ready for McCain's nuclear plans
http://www.fosters.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080724/GJNEWS_01/488230042

ROCHESTER — Republican presidential candidate Sen. John McCain believes the country needs to build 100 more nuclear power plants to achieve independence from foreign oil.

He also told 700 supporters at a Town Meeting event Tuesday at the Rochester Opera House that he would be willing to revisit the Seabrook Unit 2 reactor project that Florida Power & Light officials dismantled in 2003.

But officials at FPL Energy, which owns and operates Seabrook Station, have previously said they have no intention of building a second nuclear reactor even though Seabrook is licensed to have two reactors by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. FPL Energy is a subsidiary of FPL Group in Florida.

Alan Griffith, a spokesman for FPL Energy and Seabrook Station, said Wednesday that the company's position has not changed following McCain's remarks.

<more>
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DCKit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jul-24-08 09:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. The writing's on the wall - No handouts from an Obama administration...
and no sense sucking up to McLoser in the meantime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
trof Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jul-25-08 06:39 AM
Response to Original message
2. Ah, Seabrook. "Electricity too cheap to meter."
We were house hunting in southern NH in the early summer of 1977.
Found a house we really liked. It was all electric.
I asked the realtor what he thought the average monthly electric bill might run.

He told me that once the Seabrook nuclear plant came on line the word was that the electricity would be too cheap to meter. Not worth going to the expense of buying and installing meters.
They would probably just charge a monthly fee of $10-$15 for all the power you could use.

Our first winter month electric bill was $200.
Thereafter we heated with a wood stove and fireplace, then a coal stove, and finally had an oil fired, forced air system installed.

"Too cheap to meter."
:rofl:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:57 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC