Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why offshore wind is poised to restructure our energy picture

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
kristopher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 05:14 AM
Original message
Why offshore wind is poised to restructure our energy picture
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, VOL. 34, L02817, doi:10.1029/2006GL028016, 2007

Large CO2 reductions via offshore wind power matched to inherent storage in energy end-uses

Willett Kempton

College of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware,
Newark, Delaware, USA

Cristina L. Archer

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University,
Stanford, California, USA

Amardeep Dhanju and Richard W. Garvine

College of Marine and Earth Studies, University of Delaware,
Newark, Delaware, USA

Mark Z. Jacobson

Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University,
Stanford, California, USA

Abstract

<1> We develop methods for assessing offshore wind resources, using a model of the vertical structure of the planetary boundary layer (PBL) over water and a wind-electric technology analysis linking turbine and tower limitations to bathymetry and continental shelf geology.

These methods are tested by matching the winds of the Middle-Atlantic Bight (MAB) to energy demand in the adjacent states (Massachusetts through North Carolina, U.S.A.).

We find that the MAB wind resource can produce 330 GW average electrical power, a resource exceeding the region's current summed demand for 73 GW of electricity, 29 GW of light vehicle fuels (now gasoline), and 83 GW of building fuels (now distillate fuel oil and natural gas).

Supplying these end-uses with MAB wind power would reduce by 68% the region's CO2 emissions, and reduce by 57% its greenhouse gas forcing. These percentages are in the range of the global reductions needed to stabilize climate.

http://www.agu.org/journals/gl/gl0702/2006GL028016/

The article is available at the chapter tabs to the left of the abstract.
If you can't access it for some reason, let me know and I'll point you to a prepublication version I also found.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MaryCeleste Donating Member (898 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Mar-13-08 07:29 AM
Response to Original message
1. I would also argue that every locale has to be part of the solution
and that those which NIMBY should not share in the clean renewable power. Ted Kennedy are you listening?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC