Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Xpost: California wants to control home thermostats (Hmmm)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:34 AM
Original message
Xpost: California wants to control home thermostats (Hmmm)
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 07:39 AM by Dead_Parrot
SAN FRANCISCO: The conceit in the 1960s show "The Outer Limits" was that outside forces had taken control of your television set.

Next year in California, state regulators are likely to have the emergency power to control individual thermostats, sending temperatures up or down through a radio-controlled device that will be required in new or substantially modified houses and buildings to manage electricity shortages.

The proposed rules are contained in a document circulated by the California Energy Commission, which for more than three decades has set state energy efficiency standards for home appliances, like water heaters, air conditioners and refrigerators.

The changes would allow utilities to adjust customers' preset temperatures when the price of electricity is soaring. Customers could override the utilities' suggested temperatures. But in emergencies, the utilities could override customers' wishes.


Article at http://www.iht.com/articles/2008/01/11/america/calif.php
Original LBN thread at http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=102x3136767#3136821

What caught my eye was the responses, many of which seemed horrified at the prospect of being forced to use less power by the people that make it: I had to check I hadn't stumbled into FR by mistake. Kudos to Boreal for trying to insert some sanity, BTW.

Anyway, I thought in the light of this thread it might be interesting to discuss smart grids, demand side management, if having your A/C tweaked is only one step away from room 101, and whether (given these are the responses from liberals) there is any fucking hope.

For the record, although hydro is waaaay more reliable that wind or solar, I'm now well used to having the power company remotely switch off my hot water tank, office heating, or even the entire house if there's no juice. It's annoying, but it beats building another fossil fuel power station or having brown-outs in the hospital.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Double T Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:43 AM
Response to Original message
1. Many Americans have no self control or feel the responsibility to conserve energy.
Edited on Sun Jan-13-08 07:44 AM by Double T
Inevitably the government will take control of our ALL of our energy usage for vehicles and homes and have mandatory control over the number of offspring allowed by each individual, which will be no more than 2 throughout a person's lifetime.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rodeodance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
2. I think it is a good idea. I have neighbor who keeps temp very high so she
can dress loosely as she says--shorts t-shirts in the winter.
then she opens a winder if gets too hot--NOT shut down temp.

you are right. there are too too many irresponsible people
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greenman3610 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. the controversy is right wing nonsense.
this is not a means to enforce frugality, or intrude in people's lives.
"Smart" appliances, such as refrigerators, will be, in effect,
energy storage devices that will allow the occasionally
stressed grid to take a breather.
Your "smart" electric meter, will simply allow your fridge to
shut off for a few moments, say, the time in which the temp would
rise insignificantly from 26 to 27 degrees inside.
This action, rolled across a whole grid, and multiplied many
times, would amount to a huge savings in energy, and allow
great cost savings by avoiding the need for new generating
capacity that is only used to meet once in a year "peak" emergencies.

The same technology is going to allow you to have solar cells
on your roof and sell the power back to the grid, to
power your car with electricity, and sell your unused
battery capacity back to the grid, potentially earning
thousands of dollars per year for electric car owners.

The Orwellian analogies are simply playing to the deepest
Dittohead ignoramuses.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 07:26 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. And yet, it's people on the left coming up with the Orwellian analogies
at least in LBN. I agree that there's nothing wrong with the technology, but it seems there's a long way to go before the image comes right
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 08:05 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Same on the earlier thread in GD
The vast majority of reponses were either paranoid, self-indulgent or reflected the wasteful, devil may care type attitudes that characterize so many in America these days.

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=389&topic_id=2664211&mesg_id=2664343

Apparently, it's going to take another couple rounds of rolling blackouts- or a widespead failure on the Western Grid for these folks to get a clue that they're in a tragedy of the commons situation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 04:59 AM
Response to Reply #7
9. Oh dear.
I'd missed that thread. Now I'm really depressed. :banghead:

Still, it's nice to see the spirit of pointing-the-finger-at-anyone-else is alive and well. It's just like the Kyoto negotiations, but with smilies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NickB79 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
4. Honestly, if this scares some DU'ers
They're in a for a world of hurt in the next decade. This is honestly one of the least draconian measures I'm expecting to see put into place as we progress further down the peak fossil slope and up the climate change slope.

And yeah, those responses make me wonder if we have any hope as well. I mean, Al Gore is a rock star on DU for his work on An Inconvenient Truth, but it's like his message still hasn't sunk into the minds of most DU'ers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The2ndWheel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. The increasing control of the state and the corporation over every aspect of life
It's going to be a fun century.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jan-13-08 10:49 PM
Response to Original message
8. Before they do this they ought to institute severe penalties for leaving
doors and windows of homes and businesses wide open when the heat or AC is on. I KID YOU NOT, this is all the rage in Los Angeles, land of 119 degree summer days. The excuse is always "we wanted fresh air" when I complain to the guilty. I'd support hard prison time and $1 million fines for this crap.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dead_Parrot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 05:15 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. We could send them to live with the Maasai for a month.
A month should be long enough for them to lean how to deal with that sort of heat without so much as a water cooler.

It should also be long enough to rip out thier A/C and nail the bugger's windows shut.

Although, I'm guessing the local jails don't have decent A/C or fully opening windows, so your option would have a similar effect without incuring the air miles. :)

As an aside, I'm impressed there is fresh air in LA...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bananas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 08:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. They got rid of the mandatory override
http://nctimes.com/articles/2008/01/11/news/breaking/9_02_1801_11_08.txt

Energy Commision to remove mandatory thermostat control

By: BRADLEY J. FIKES -- North County Times

The California Energy Commission will remove a proposed mandatory control feature from thermostats required in new homes, Claudia Chandler, the commission's assistant executive director, said Friday.

The control feature, specified in an upcoming revision to building codes, would have required so-called Programmable Communicating Thermostats to be installed with the air conditioning systems of new homes. These thermostats would have deferred in emergencies to a radio signal broadcast by utilities, removing control from customers.

After public protests, Chandler said, the commission decided to remove the mandatory provision from the proposal for the "Title 24" energy efficiency standards. Staff will make the recommendation at the energy commission's Jan. 30 meeting, and the new proposal would be taken up at a later meeting.

"The consumer or customer can overrride the emergency control," with the change, Chandler said. The system would notify customers of an emergency. If the customer did nothing, utilities could reset the thermostat to a higher temperature, but no higher than 88 degrees.

If customers don't want to give control of the thermostat to the utility, they can override the control, Chandler said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phantom power Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jan-14-08 10:11 AM
Response to Original message
12. On some level, isn't the choice between planned versus unplanned blackouts?
I mean, whether people like it or not, the electric utility can shut off their power. Maybe somebody should point out that this way, just their A/C and/or hot water goes off, and I assume with at least some warning. Or, they can pretend they're in "control," and just have the electric utility shut off entire grid subsections, on an emergency basis with no warning, in which case their entire house will lose power.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 10:12 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC