Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

GAO Slams Bush Interior Department For Lack Of Climate Guidelines For Parks, Managers - SF Gate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 12:53 PM
Original message
GAO Slams Bush Interior Department For Lack Of Climate Guidelines For Parks, Managers - SF Gate
No! Say it isn't so!

:silly:

Earlier snowmelts, longer summer droughts and bigger Western wildfires on federal lands are being caused more by "climatic conditions than land management techniques," government investigators conclude. They fault the Bush administration for not providing managers of national parks, wildlife preserves and marine sanctuaries with better guidance on how to address the effects of global warming.

A report Thursday by the Government Accountability Office found the Interior Department has "not made climate change a high priority," despite a 2001 order to include climate change in land management planning. That order more than six years ago was issued by then-Interior Secretary Bruce Babbitt on the last full day of the Clinton administration. "Without such guidance, their ability to address climate change and effectively manage resources is constrained," the report says.

Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and John McCain, R-Ariz., requested the GAO's 184-page report on March 8, 2004, when both were running for the presidential nomination in their respective parties. GAO investigators also found:


_Since 1850, the glaciers in Glacier National Park have declined from 150 to 26, and both summer and winter temperatures are increasing in the park. Some projections say the park's glaciers will be gone within 25 to 30 years.


_As much as 1.4 million acres of forests in Alaska, in the Chugach and the Kenai Peninsula, are dying off at higher rates than usual because of an infestation of spruce bark beetles attributed to climate-related insect outbreaks.

EDIT

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/09/06/national/w080528D99.DTL&type=politics
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
kestrel91316 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 01:07 PM
Response to Original message
1. I'm sure Bush figures that once the glaciers are gone from Glacier NP,
we can just sell it off as surplus government land (since "no one will want to vacation there") to his rich friends for their 5th homes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kolesar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 03:28 PM
Response to Original message
2. "guidance on how to address the effects of global warming" What does that mean?
Spray the runaway bark beetles and raise the docks at Acadia NP (on the Atlantic Ocean)?
Make the NPS.gov website so snazzy that you don't even have to go there to enjoy it?
Shame the visitors for wasting fuel to get to the remote mountain parks?
Build a train station so that you can take the train to Mammoth at Yellowstone NP again?
Install CFLs and other energy efficiency methods?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
razzleberry Donating Member (877 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-06-07 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
3. the US Forest Service needs to get into the carbon-offset scam. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:17 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Environment/Energy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC