Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If you BANK at a Citibank, better read this.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 10:47 PM
Original message
If you BANK at a Citibank, better read this.
And I would like to know....does YOUR Citibank( NOT credit card, but banking)
statement have this on it:

This is from Today's Market Ticker.

****Seen on a recent Citibank (C) statement: "Effective April 1, 2010, we reserve the right to require
(7) days advance notice before permitting a withdrawal from all checking accounts.
While we do not currently exercise this right and have not exercised it in the past, we are required by law to notify you of this change."

The writer there says that he called Citi (as did the other author over on the other site) and was told this applied "only to accounts in Texas."
Folks, the formal name for a checking account is a demand account. It is called a demand account for the very reason that you have a right to all your money, on demand.

Now maybe there's some new law that applies only in Texas, or maybe there isn't. Who knows - or cares.

The fact of the matter is that any bank that reserves the right (whether they claim through some external cause or not) to throw up a gate on a demand account is no longer marketing demand accounts.

My checking account is such a demand account and I'll be damned if I'll have my checking money anywhere that doesn't fit that description.******

http://market-ticker.denninger.net/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Somawas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. Change banks NOW!
Time to vote with our feet on Citi.

End their problem of being too big to fail by making them smaller.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldhippie Donating Member (355 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 10:59 PM
Response to Original message
2. If I remember some old banking law classes from years ago ........
..... with a demand account you can always withdraw your funds "on demand." However, those funds may be provided as a cashier's check, bank check, wire transfer, or other "instrument." To actually get cash or currency the banks have the ability by law to place limits on the amount to be withdrawn per day, or to allow a certain number of days to come up with the cash. This is because no bank has enough cash on hand to service all custmers who might want to withdraw all their funds in cash in a crisis. The government allows this, even encourages it, to allow them (the govt) to be able to declare a "bank holiday" in an emrgency and gain some coolong off time.

I don't think this is new. Texas may have just passed a law requiring more periodic disclosure of this rule. Again, my knowledge is dated. Others may have more recent info. If there is something new I'd like to know about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 11:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. Banks do not generally make ongoing customers wait a week to get money
for day to day expenses.
Waiting a week to clear a large check is one thing.
Waiting a week to draw out ANY money from an existing account is another.
What if your Citi Credit card needs to be paid?
And you cannot write a check for a week?
How much money will Citibank make on the interest of that card multiplied by 1,000s of
Citibank customers.
What happens when other banks decide the same thing?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-22-10 11:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. Actually, "demand" account don't necessarily mean "on demand"

The legal definition actually allows for up to a seven-day wait, but if they do that they have to disclose it in their depositor agreement. See page 35 of the document below.


http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/supmanual/cch/200911/cch200911.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jaysunb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 11:08 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chase beat them the crime scene.
Five (5) bucks to cash a check drawn on THAT bank, at THAT branch, if YOU don't have an account there. :evilfrown:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susu369 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 08:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
12. That blows my mind
Several large banks do that. I just do not see how that is legal when the funds are from that bank. It's been going on for about two or three years now. Wish someone would take it to court.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 03:45 AM
Response to Reply #12
21. I'm guessing the reason for that service charge is
to provide some sort of insurance in case the person who doesn't have an account at the bank (and is therefore unknown to the bank) is actually trying to cash a phony/forged or stolen check.

Just my guess.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 03:16 PM
Response to Reply #21
22. Nah... it's not insurance, it's plain old fee income.
They charge it because they can. They're providing a service and you aren't already a customer, so they can charge you without losing your business.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FBaggins Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Feb-23-10 03:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. It has been to court a number of times.
It always loses. The bank is only required to pay a check when it is properly "presented" (in this case with an endorsement guarantee from your bank). They can charge a fee if they elect to cash a check they aren't required to.

It's gone at least to the appellate court level and lost even when the check in question was a Cashier's Check drawn on that bank.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demosincebirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 11:27 PM
Response to Original message
5. I got a notice, yesterday, from Citicard that there would be a $60 a
year service charge on my CC if I don't charge at least $2400, a years. I do charge more than triple that amount a years. I still called 'em up and cancelled it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roamer65 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #5
15. Shiti is just pissed that people can pay off the higher CC interest rate balances now.
Edited on Sat Feb-20-10 11:54 AM by roamer65
One of their famous little games ends Feb 22nd with the new CC law.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Feb-19-10 11:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. Not that I have much money,
but what little I have is in a small community bank.

No way my money would go to these bastards.

Your money is their money and those of us willing to open our eyes and do just a little digging, no that's just the way the ptb want it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KILL THE WISE ONE Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:19 AM
Response to Original message
7. move your money before they collapse
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
metapunditedgy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 12:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. I held some shares of a "money-market" fund that went under, and they did exactly
the same thing. When the fund failed, they didn't have the cash on hand to pay everybody out right away. (It wasn't as bad as Madoff, they just couldn't get all the money together, and still haven't gotten it all back to investors.) It was a big deal and they had to work out special permission with the SEC to hold onto the money. Rules for money market funds have since changed, as well.

When a fund or a bank says they want the right to keep you from withdrawing your money, the scenario is that they want to avoid a bank run if the bank fails.

I wouldn't bank at Citi for a whole host of reasons, but other banks probably have similar rules hidden in the fine print.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DAMANgoldberg Donating Member (377 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 01:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. I'm with a smaller bank...
In the shadow of 2 of the 5 largest banks in America (3 mi and eyesight), and I would have nothing to do with them because they are greedy, not responsive to the community, and flat out jerks that wouldn't know a competent teller if it gave them a wet kiss.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
upi402 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 03:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. I demanded my checking account money once, bank said no, i withdrew all
...at my first opportunity. they failed soon after in the S&L crisis. 5 banks that i thought were unreasonable and caused me to leave, have failed. and WaMu failed even though i approved wholeheartedly. 5 for 6 :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 07:13 AM
Response to Original message
11. If you want to check out the health of your bank, here are 2 links:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nc4bo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Good googly-moogly.


I swear to God I never thought I'd see so many numbers = one whole number in my life.

:puke:

Too big too fail, too big to fail - THank God It Passed. :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dixiegrrrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Look how much the failed loan numbers jumped since 08.
And they were big then.
"Loans 90 days past due"
and
"non-accruing loans"

profit is at minus back in Sept. 09.

Not really a good set of numbers, and if you count the REAL book keeping they should be doing for all their failed loans, it would look worse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asdjrocky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Morning kick.
Coz this is the good stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
abelenkpe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
17. scary. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Soylent Brice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Feb-20-10 11:09 PM
Response to Original message
18. good luck to them with that.
that should go over just hunky dory.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wishlist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Feb-21-10 10:53 AM
Response to Original message
19. Capital One Money Market will also put a 7 bus. day hold on good deposits
Edited on Sun Feb-21-10 10:54 AM by wishlist
I got screwed recently when I deposited a large payment to Capital One and then wrote a small check on it before 7 business days had elapsed. Cap One did not advise me of the hold. Cap One didn't charge me with a fee, but the bank I tried to deposit the Cap One check into did charge me a hefty fee because Cap One wouldn't honor my check although Capital One had my deposit money which had come out of another bank days earlier and there was no question Cap One clearly had my money on deposit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 08th 2024, 07:30 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC