Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Americans' tax burden is lightest in developed world - USA Today

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 05:53 PM
Original message
Americans' tax burden is lightest in developed world - USA Today
http://www.usatoday.com/money/perfi/taxes/2009-11-25-oecd25_ST_N.htm

You'd never know it from all the cable news chatter, but Americans bear the lightest tax burden in the developed world.

Total U.S. tax revenues in 2008 equaled 26.9% of gross domestic product, according to provisional figures released Tuesday by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. That figure – which includes local, state and federal taxes, including Social Security – was lower than the 1990 ratio and far below levels across Europe. In Denmark, the total tax take exceeds 48% of the economy. In France, it tops 43%; Germany, 36%.

(more)



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
laughingliberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
1. Funny, the supply siders told us low taxes would lead to great economic strides for everyone
but we're doing worse than the countries with higher taxes. You don't think they lied to us, do you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Maybe, but I think they really BELIEVE THAT! There are quite
a few people who really believe that you should be able to keep EVERYTHING you earn and the only Gov't services should bepolice, fire dept, and maybe building highways. They think that anyone who really tries can be successful that way, and those who are sick should be taken care of by charities. Listen to Thom Hatmann sometine. Almost every day he has a RWer on his show that argues that point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
econoclast Donating Member (259 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 04:22 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. doing worse? by what measure?
Edited on Mon Nov-30-09 04:57 PM by econoclast
remember, the tax burden numbers are reported here as a percentage of GDP. A fraction with taxes in he numerator and GDP in the denominator.

So, if a country's GDP is relatively bigger, the same tax rates produce a smaller percentage of GDP.

I was curious. So I pulled up the OECD annual GDP growth rates from 1984 thru 2008. I added the GDP growth rates up across the years for each country and compared them to the average tax burden in 2007 & 2008. Here is the result sorted from lowest tax burden as a % of GDP to the highest:

Country GDP TAX
Unit Stat 70.64 27.60%
Canada 66.97 32.75%
Unit King 64.30 35.90%
Germany 49.51 36.30%
Austria 60.36 42.60%
Finland 62.08 42.90%
France 51.01 43.30%
Italy 41.30 43.35%
Belgium 53.31 44.10%
Sweden 54.37 47.70%
Denmark 47.19 48.50%


Germany gets special dispensation for its abnormaly low GDP growth rates because it was trying to incorporate East Germany into the West. But other than that it really looks like the higher the taxes the lower the GDP growth rates.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Dec-01-09 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #9
11. wonder how our debt looks compared to those nations? I also notice that our % gdp change
Edited on Tue Dec-01-09 07:04 PM by JohnWxy


per year was trending downward from 2004 - 2008. THese are the only years I could find data for. I wouldn't mind seeing links for your data .

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Dec-02-09 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #1
12. Of course they were only talking about lower taxes for the wealtlhiest -
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/mitchell-bard/republicans-in-the-house_b_162303.html

Of the myriad problems George W. Bush and his enablers in Congress left on Obama's desk, the most pressing is perceived to be the economy. So Obama's first major legislative initiative was the stimulus package. Under the market-cures-all philosophy of the last administration (and, in fairness, every administration going back to Ronald Reagan), the financial system collapsed as the greed and irresponsibility of institutions finally reached a tipping point. But what was even more acute during the last eight years was the historic and devastating redistribution of wealth, whereby Bush's tax cuts for the rich and unfailing support for corporate interests led to a situation where, as former Rep. David Bonior put it on Meet the Press on January 11:

"over the last 20 years, the top 10 percent took 90 percent of the income gains in this -- in the country.

And the top 1 percent took roughly 60 percent.

And the top 1/10th of 1 percent took 35 percent of that. I mean, it's skewed the wrong way."


The system of tax cuts and the like turned the surplus of the Clinton years into a massive deficit, even before the $700 billion financial bailout and current stimulus package came into play. And the Bush years allowed massive gains for the wealthy, all while middle class wages, in real dollars, fell.
]

So, if nothing else, we should all be in agreement that the Bush years were a debacle, and that the policies of the administration need to be rejected, much like the bake sale/casino night of my analogy.
(more)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
napi21 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
2. only an idiot would believe you can constantly lower taxes
and not reach the TOO LOW point sooner or later!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prometheuspan Donating Member (168 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. inside of the current system true, but, kill the fed bank...
Edited on Sun Nov-29-09 06:39 PM by Prometheuspan
"only an idiot would believe you can constantly lower taxes"

right, they dropped taxes on the rich, the tax burden shifted to the poor, the poor can't carry any more load. Crunch. Its like
loading a mule with a 5 ton truck. Its not going to pull it, no matter how hard you whip, beg, or pray.


on the other hand, if we just got rid of the un fed fed bank and had congress print the money like it says in the constitution,

we could have zero taxes, and just have the congress bank government distribute the new cash to pay its bills.


the main problem is we keep making these deals with the devil...



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Art_from_Ark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 11:28 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. Where does the Constitution give Congress the authority to print money?
The Constitution, which was written in the aftermath of the "not worth a Continental" controversy, specifically mandates gold and silver to be the country's legal tender.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:19 PM
Response to Original message
4. Lightest at the top.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
5. And most of it's spent on the damn military it seems. No wonder we have a
social safety net full of holes. Sigh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eleny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Nov-29-09 07:17 PM
Response to Original message
7. I'd like to know how the weight of our nation's debt compares to those other nations
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
notesdev Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Nov-30-09 03:38 AM
Response to Original message
8. I wonder what the figures look like
if you filter out the top 1%. I'd wager that for everyone else our taxes are right in line with the rest of the developed world. When Goldman Sachs gets to pay all of a 1% tax rate (sadly, not an exaggeration) that will skew the numbers overall.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RainDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Dec-05-09 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
13. and it is destroying our society.
Edited on Sat Dec-05-09 09:34 AM by RainDog
I don't hope for apocalyptic scenarios but people are being pushed to the wall by the tax policies of both democrats and republicans since Reagan.

when or if the push back comes, I hope it's the rich who are dragged out onto the streets and not some working class schlubs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 23rd 2024, 03:39 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC