Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Goldman, Fed, Citi Getting Preferential Allotments of H1N1 Vaccine

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 06:06 AM
Original message
Goldman, Fed, Citi Getting Preferential Allotments of H1N1 Vaccine

It should come as no surprise that those at the top of the food chain get preferential treatment on all levels. But this still stinks to high heaven. Employees of the Goldman, the Fed, Citigroup, and other banks are getting H1N1 vaccine allotments out of proportion to what can be justified from a public health standpoint. In particular, Goldman has gotten more than Lenox HIll hospital, which needs it not just for the sick but more important, for workers (not only does the public need to keep front-line health care workers in as good shape as possible, but if they get the infection, they become disease vectors fast, given the number of people they see).

Then again, banks have become parasitic, so why should we expect anything different? And although Business Week broke the story, it did it press release style:

To the list of hundreds of schools, hospitals, and community health centers that have received limited allocations of the H1N1 swine flu vaccine, you can now add some of New York’s largest employers. In the past week or so 13 companies, including Citigroup (C) and Goldman Sachs (GS), have begun receiving small quantities of the vaccine, according to city health authorities.

Citigroup has been supplied with 1,200 units and Goldman with 200, says Jessica Scaperotti, press secretary for the Department of Health & Mental Hygiene. The agency has so far approved orders by 29 employers—including 16 that have yet to receive any vaccine—after they were cleared by the U.S. Centers for Disease Control & Prevention (CDC). Big employers that have received or are scheduled to receive vaccine so far include Time Warner (TWX), JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Memorial Sloan-Kettering, New York Presbyterian Healthcare System, and New York University.

Health-care workers at those employers are bound by the CDC to distribute the vaccine only to populations deemed to be at high risk of developing serious complications from swine flu: pregnant women, children and young people aged 6 months to 24 years, people who live with or provide care for infants under 6 months (who cannot be vaccinated), people aged 24 to 64 with medical conditions that put them at higher risk for flu-related complications, and health-care workers and emergency medical personnel.

Yves here. Welcome to the class system in action. If you don’t work for a big, influential company, go to the back of the queue. Why should companies be the nexus of distribution for vaccines? I guarantee no Goldman MD gets much of his routine medical treatment from the GS health workers on staff (emergencies or a fast diagnostic like a strep test are different). But if you work for a less privileged employer or are self-employed or between jobs, tough luck, go to the back of the queue, you have to try to get yours (assuming you can) from vaccination centers in New York City. How easy do you think that will be? The difficulty and queuing are certain to be much worse than for any of the big financial players.

Continued>>>
http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2009/11/goldman-fed-citi-getting-preferential-allotments-of-h1n1-vaccine.html

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MannyGoldstein Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 07:26 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd think this should be on the front page?
Edited on Fri Nov-06-09 07:27 AM by MannyGoldstein
It tells us a lot about who counts to our government, and who doesn't. Could it be clearer?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Why Syzygy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-06-09 11:34 PM
Response to Original message
2. Well if they are TOO BIG to FAIL
(even when they really DO fail), we can't expect them to stay home sick, can we.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
northernlights Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 07:31 AM
Response to Original message
3. I don't like it, but this sort of explains it
Edited on Sat Nov-07-09 07:32 AM by northernlights
"Health-care workers at those employers are bound by the CDC to distribute the vaccine only to populations deemed to be at high risk of developing serious complications from swine flu: pregnant women, children and young people aged 6 months to 24 years, people who live with or provide care for infants under 6 months (who cannot be vaccinated), people aged 24 to 64 with medical conditions that put them at higher risk for flu-related complications, and health-care workers and emergency medical personnel. "

Very large employers often have health-care workers on staff -- I remember we did in the middle years of high tech (well before the big bubble, but while high tech was growing steadily). It looks as though the CDC is essentially allowing them to act as a distribution center for the vaccine, which gives some relief to the "real" health care system.

I believe there are 2 major reasons why the adminsitration pushed the development of the vaccine:

1. was PR, to ensure we didn't end up with another Katrina made-for-tv disaster, to distinguish this admin from the previous nightmare

2. to prevent disruption to the "economic recovery" by having scores of companies forced to shut down due to no employees showing up.

This action fits well into the above scenario.

And yes, the well-employed and better-off do end up the beneficiaries of the public largess. Which burns my butt, but there you have it. x(


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Backlash Cometh Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
4. This preferential treatment is customary at the top.
Where I live, people are always looking for ways to define the differences in status. Somethings make sense, like providing parking space near the auditoriums for those who are annual members; or fast lanes for those who pay more. Where it doesn't make sense is when a good ole boy gets a house built, breaking every imaginable code.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Robb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Nov-07-09 11:34 AM
Response to Original message
5. Conjecture.
I see no source offered to support the notion that the companies got their vaccine first, or that the "difficulty and queuing" are going to be worse for the general public.

I walked into a clinic Thursday. There was no waiting, and as I'm caring for an infant I received the attenuated virus nasal spray.

The idea is to distribute the vaccine quickly. It's not just banks, it's most big companies that have health departments that got some vaccine. Kroger, Microsoft, you name it, if there's an on-site clinic and the state health dept. approved it, they got some.

I would guess the employed are marginally more likely to spread the virus than the unemployed, so from an epidemiological standpoint it would make some sense to get it to them first. But there's no evidence that happened.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu Apr 25th 2024, 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC