Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Household Income and Debt Trends Since 1980: Quick Picks

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
Joanne98 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 01:01 PM
Original message
Household Income and Debt Trends Since 1980: Quick Picks

posted by Kathleen Keest

The folks who write Credit Slips are among those who have long wondered what the “exit strategy” was for an economy that was predictably on a wobbly course, with about 70% of GDP driven by household spending when many of those households were on kind of shaky ground. That’s obviously not a sustainable long term strategy for economic growth when, on one hand, the income side of the ledger for a large share of those households was sputtering or stalling, while demands on the expense side from big ticket, basic items like health care and health care financing, education, and housing were growing. The American household debt burden looks like a more complex problem if you think about the cumulative impact of all of these trends, rather than just thinking “flat screen TV” and stopping there.

In looking at data about these trends, I’ve been struck by the comparisons between the first post-WWII era (roughly the 30-35 years ending in the late 70s – early 80s), and the second one covering the last 30-some years. Since the current crisis seems likely to serve as the end point to the late 20th century economic era, it’s interesting take a Before and After look at the household account trends.

Income growth: Through this last period, the income gains have skewed increasingly not just to the top, but to the very tippy-top. From 1946 – 1976, the average income growth for the “bottom” 90% of households was 92%, compared to 25% for the top 1%. But from 1976 to 2006, the bottom 90% saw only 10% growth, while for the top 1% it was (wait for it --) 239%. (Sources for this and related figures are cited in the appendix to CRL’s comments to the Fed's then-proposed rules defining unfair and deceptive practices for credit cards.) For a really cool visual of this uncool trend, take a look at the graphic in Clive Crook’s 2006 Atlantic article called "The Height of Inequality." And while you’re there, the story’s pretty interesting, too.

Savings: A chart on the "By the Numbers" page on Inequality.org shows that the savings rate roughly doubled from 5% in 1949 to over 11% in 1982. Since 1982, it looks like a downhill ski slope, and the rate was in negative territory by 2006.

Debt: The debt-to-disposable income ratio of American households more than doubled from 60% in 1980 to 133% in 2007. A recent article in the Economist says that household and consumer debt went up from 100% of GDP in 1980 to 173% now.

Sorry I haven't yet collected nice links to specifics on those expense-side demands, except for a recent Washington Post article noting that “college tuition and fees have jumped nearly 440%" since the early 80s, but you get the picture.

Continued>>>
http://www.creditslips.org/creditslips/2009/02/the-folks-who-write-credit-slips-are-among-those-who-have-long-wondered-where-the-exit-strategy-was-for-an-economy-that.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
unlawflcombatnt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Feb-16-09 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Outsourcing & Globalization biggest single factor
The outsourcing of American jobs to cheap foreign labor markets is the single biggest factor for the stagnation of incomes of non-affluent Americans. Outsourcing jobs reduces American employment, demand for American labor, and hence wages.

Real wages reached their peak in 1973, and have been on the downslope ever since. 1973 is when we began the change from being an economic powerhouse into a free-trading, job-outsourcing economic disaster. The rich benefited from the labor cost reductions of cheap foreign labor. American workers lost from competition with cheap foreign labor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 11:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC