Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Unemployment up to 6.5% (10.1 million) - bureau of Labor Statistics.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU
 
JohnWxy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:35 PM
Original message
Unemployment up to 6.5% (10.1 million) - bureau of Labor Statistics.
THE EMPLOYMENT SITUATION: OCTOBER 2008


Nonfarm payroll employment fell by 240,000 in October, and the unemployment rate
rose from 6.1 to 6.5 percent, the Bureau of Labor Statistics of the U.S. Department
of Labor reported today. October's drop in payroll employment followed declines of
127,000 in August and 284,000 in September, as revised. Employment has fallen by
1.2 million in the first 10 months of 2008; over half of the decrease has occurred
in the past 3 months. In October, job losses continued in manufacturing, construc-
tion, and several service-providing industries. Health care and mining continued
to add jobs.

Unemployment (Household Survey Data)

The unemployment rate rose by 0.4 percentage point to 6.5 percent in October,
and the number of unemployed persons increased by 603,000 to 10.1 million. Over
the past 12 months, the number of unemployed persons has increased by 2.8 mil-
lion, and the unemployment rate has risen by 1.7 percentage points. (See
table A-1.)


http://www.bls.gov/news.release/empsit.nr0.htm

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amdezurik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
1. and that is AFTER the books are cooked
...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snappyturtle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Yes! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lurky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-07-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly.
I heard 11-12% "real" unemployment on the radio today. That seems more like it to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinqy Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 03:19 PM
Response to Reply #3
4. It depends...
The "11-12%" figure you're talking about includes people who have not looked for work in the past 4 weeks, but have looked sometime in the last 12 months and stated they were able to work during the week of the survey (the marginally attached) and people who are working part time because of slack work/business conditions or they are unable to find full-time work.

The standard definition of unemployed (international standard) is over 16, not in the military, jail/prison, or an institution, did not work during the reference week, and actively looked for work in the previous 4 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. But the "actively looked for work" requirement overlooks people who are discouraged
Some people don't work because they are retired, a student, or a stay-at-home parent. Others want to work but have given up finding anything in their chosen field and may lack the skills required for a similarly paid situation. Also, I'd really like to see an accounting of "under-employment", that is, people who got laid off or outsourced from a high-skill well-paid position and are now working part-time in a low-wage job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinqy Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. But the numbers are counted
The number of discouraged and others marginally attached to the labor force, and the numbers of those working part-time for economic reasons are all in the news release (tables A-13 and A-5 respectively) Did you bother to read it?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
5. The figure is WAAAAAY understated.
I personally know several unemployed people and not one is collecting unemployment benefits.

I really hope (naively, I know) that the Obama admin. will institute a more truthful accounting of things like unemployment and inflation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pinqy Donating Member (536 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Nov-14-08 10:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Huh?
What on earth do unemployment benefits have to do with the unemployment rate? The unemployment figures have nothing to do with whether or not anyone collects benefits.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 08:01 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Topic Forums » Economy Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC