I remember reading a press release last month about how the US Census reported that US median household income has risen over the past year. Of course, this idea of robust growth did not seem to comport with my experiences in my community. Well, it turns out that median household income did grow, but when you compare growth under Bush to growth under Clinton, there simply is no comparison.
http://www.census.gov/prod/2006pubs/p60-231.pdf For example, on page 11, the graph shows that real median household grew by over $5,000 under Clinton. However, under Bush, real median household income has yet to recover the levels reached under Bush. Bottom line: Americans are earning less when adjusted for inflation.
Page 47 of the census is even more damning, since it breaks out real income growth by quintiles.
Under Clinton (1992 to 2000):
1. The real income threshold for the top 5% of Americans grew from $135K in 1992 to $164K in 2000.
2. The top 20% of American households saw their real income grow from $124K in 1992 to $161K in 2000.
3. The middle 20% of American households saw their real income grow from $41K in 1992 to about $48K in 2000.
4. The bottom 20% of American households saw their real income grow from about $10K in 1992 to about $11.5K in 2000.
Bottom line: All Americans enjoyed real growth in income during the Clinton years, particularly the top 20%.
Under Bush (2000-2005):
1. The real income threshold for the top 5% of Americans grew from $164K in 2000 to $166K in 2005.
2. The top 20% of American households saw their real income FALL from $161K in 2000 to $159K in 2005.
3. The middle 20% of American households saw their real income FALL from $48K in 2000 to $46K in 2005.
4. The bottom 20% of American households saw their real income FALL from $11.5K in 2000 to $10.5K in 2005.
Bottom line: Only the top 5% of American households enjoyed any real income growth, while most Americans are poorer now then they were at the beginning of Bush's presidency. Moreover, the growth in income of the top 5% was at a substantially lower rate of growth then they enjoyed under Clinton.
The frustrating thing, of course, is that Bush will point to the anemic growth in non-inflation adjusted income enjoyed in the past year or so, and declare that his tax cuts are working, which is kind of like how freedom is winning in the war on terror.